-0.32goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.100% of Manchester City’s build-up value
league 0.24
Omar Marmoush ranks 7th of 398 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 16.8m on average. They carry 3% of Manchester City’s attacking involvement, the 12th largest share in the squad.
Against their position
109 forwards
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.3978th
Non-penalty goals
0.3983rd
xG
0.4982nd
Non-penalty xG
0.4986th
Shots
3.9098th
npxG per shot
0.1347th
Shot distance
16.8m44th
Set-piece share
13%37th
Goals against xG
-0.852nd
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.3998th
Expected assists
0.2893rd
Key passes
1.5678th
npxG + xA
0.7795th
xG chain
0.8091st
xG build-up
0.1025th
Assists against xA
+0.988th
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Defending
per 90
Recoveries
2.6079th
Defensive contribution
5.0876th
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
3season count
Red cards
0season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Ranked against 109 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end. Recoveries and defensive contribution come from the FPL feed and are ranked in its own positions.
This week
Gameweek 7
Next fixture
Gameweek 7
vsCoventry
Mon 19 Oct, 19:00 UTC
No shot record for Coventry in this season, so no opponent adjustment is possible. Newly promoted sides have no Premier League history to measure.
Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.
Shots
21 appearances
Over 0.516 of 2176%± 9
Over 1.57 of 2133%± 10
Over 2.54 of 2119%± 9
Over 3.52 of 2110%± 6
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 5 of 21.
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals
Omar Marmoush, 2025/26, 30 shots in the final 35m, 3 scored.
left
39%
Centre
30%
right
31%
share of their shooting xG
Chance profile
quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.126
Shots per 90
3.90
Key passes per 90
1.56
Average shot distance
16.8m
From set pieces
13%
How the chances arrive
Crosses
23%
Through balls
11%
Own dribble
13%
Headed
7%
Club role
Manchester City
What they are for
When it mattered1 of 3 goals came with the game level or Manchester City behind.
On the pitch20% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Omar Marmoush’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Erling Haaland0.7 xG4 shots, 1g
Matheus Nunes0.5 xG2 shots, 1g
Phil Foden0.5 xG1 shot, 1g
Rodri0.4 xG3 shots, 0g
Jéremy Doku0.3 xG2 shots, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Erling Haaland1.7 xG4 shots, 1g
Nico O'Reilly0.2 xG2 shots, 1g
Mathis Cherki0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Antoine Semenyo0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Phil Foden0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Season record
2025/26
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Omar Marmoush carries 0.4%of Manchester City’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.102
25% of forwards
Possession value per 900.804
91% of forwards
Ranked against 109 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
21 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
at Wolves1 shot 0 on target
v Spurs3 shots 2 on target
at Brighton1 shot 0 on target
v Bournemouth1 shot 0 on target
v Liverpool1 shot 0 on target
at Newcastle1 shot 0 on target
v Leeds1 shot 1 on target
1g
v Wolves2 shots 1 on target
at Liverpool2 shots 0 on target
v Newcastle5 shots 2 on target
at Leeds4 shots 1 on target
at West Ham2 shots 0 on target
at Everton1 shot 0 on target
1g
v Brentford1 shot 1 on target
1g
v Palace3 shots 1 on target
at Bournemouth1 shot 0 on target
5 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 5 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.