+1.91goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.201% of Manchester City’s build-up value
league 0.27
Omar Marmoush ranks 27th of 397 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 18.8m on average. They carry 5% of Manchester City’s attacking involvement, the 8th largest share in the squad.
Against their position
104 forwards
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.5391st
Non-penalty goals
0.5393rd
xG
0.4372nd
Non-penalty xG
0.4375th
Shots
3.6995th
npxG per shot
0.1234th
Shot distance
18.8m15th
Set-piece share
13%40th
Goals against xG
+1.483rd
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.008th
Expected assists
0.2063rd
Key passes
1.1347th
npxG + xA
0.6377th
xG chain
0.7376th
xG build-up
0.2046th
Assists against xA
-2.75th
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Defending
per 90
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
0season count
Red cards
0season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Ranked against 104 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.
This week
Gameweek 7
Next fixture
Gameweek 7
vsCoventry
Mon 19 Oct, 19:00 UTC
No shot record for Coventry in this season, so no opponent adjustment is possible. Newly promoted sides have no Premier League history to measure.
Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.
Shots
16 appearances
Over 0.515 of 1694%± 6
Over 1.513 of 1681%± 10
Over 2.59 of 1656%± 12
Over 3.55 of 1631%± 12
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 1 of 16.
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals
Omar Marmoush, 2024/25, 49 shots in the final 35m, 7 scored.
left
24%
Centre
55%
right
21%
share of their shooting xG
Chance profile
quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.115
Shots per 90
3.69
Key passes per 90
1.13
Average shot distance
18.8m
From set pieces
13%
How the chances arrive
Crosses
12%
Through balls
7%
Own dribble
2%
Headed
5%
Club role
Manchester City
What they are for
When it mattered4 of 7 goals came with the game level or Manchester City behind.
On the pitch35% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Omar Marmoush’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Kevin De Bruyne1.0 xG3 shots, 0g
Sávio0.9 xG6 shots, 1g
Ilkay Gündogan0.7 xG5 shots, 3g
Jéremy Doku0.4 xG5 shots, 0g
Ederson0.3 xG1 shot, 1g
Chances created
who they supply
Sávio0.8 xG5 shots, 0g
Kevin De Bruyne0.7 xG2 shots, 0g
James McAtee0.5 xG2 shots, 0g
Matheus Nunes0.3 xG1 shot, 0g
Phil Foden0.2 xG1 shot, 0g
Season record
2024/25
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Omar Marmoush carries 1.5%of Manchester City’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.196
45% of forwards
Possession value per 900.728
76% of forwards
Ranked against 104 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
16 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
v Chelsea2 shots 0 on target
at Arsenal1 shot 0 on target
3g
v Newcastle4 shots 3 on target
v Liverpool4 shots 2 on target
at Spurs1 shot 0 on target
1g
v Brighton2 shots 1 on target
1g
v Leicester9 shots 3 on target
at Man Utd4 shots 3 on target
1g
v Palace3 shots 3 on target
at Everton3 shots 1 on target
v Villa3 shots 0 on target
v Wolves2 shots 0 on target
at Southampton2 shots 0 on target
1g
v Bournemouth3 shots 1 on target
at Fulham6 shots 0 on target
1 blankno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so one sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.