-0.72goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.378% of Nottingham Forest’s build-up value
league 0.30
Morgan Gibbs-White ranks 12th of 138 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 19.1m on average, with 58% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 18% of Nottingham Forest’s attacking involvement, the 2nd largest share in the squad.
75% chance. Muscular injury - 75% chance of playing. Weigh the rates below against the chance he features at all. Club status as of 17 Oct 2026.
Against their position
87 midfielders
Average match rating6.6135th
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.1760th
Non-penalty goals
0.0029th
xG
0.2676th
Non-penalty xG
0.1351st
Shots
1.8363rd
Shots on target
0.6773rd
Shot accuracy
–not ranked
npxG per shot
0.0728th
Shot distance
19.1m50th
Set-piece share
58%91st
Goals against xG
-0.817th
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.3387th
Expected assists
0.4898th
Key passes
2.8394th
npxG + xA
0.6291st
xG chain
0.7984th
xG build-up
0.3760th
Assists against xA
-0.920th
On the ball
per 90
Touches
50.6744th
Passes
27.0035th
Pass completion
83%34th
Take-ons attempted
3.0079th
Take-on success
–not ranked
Dispossessed
1.0032nd
Defending
per 90
Tackles
1.6740th
Tackles won
–not ranked
Interceptions
0.3335th
Clearances
0.3329th
Aerials won
0.3331st
Aerial success
–not ranked
Dribbled past
0.3377th
Discipline
per 90
Fouls committed
1.0051st
Caught offside
0.679th
Errors
0season count
Yellow cards
0season count
Red cards
0season count
Ranked against 87 midfielders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.
This week
Gameweek 7
Next fixture
Gameweek 7
vsArsenal
Sun 18 Oct, 15:30 UTC
Arsenal concede 10.7 shots a match and are 0.88× the league norm against central attack (19 shots so far). A difficult one.
Projected shots
1.51
1.83 per 90 × 0.82
Projected on target
0.23
0.33 per 90 × 0.69
Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.
Shots
6 appearances
Over 0.55 of 683%± 15
Over 1.54 of 667%± 19
Over 2.52 of 633%± 19
Over 3.50 of 60%± 0
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 1 of 6.
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals
Morgan Gibbs-White, 2026/27, 11 shots in the final 35m, 1 scored.
left
1%
Centre
62%
right
37%
share of their shooting xG
Chance profile
quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.142
Shots per 90
1.83
Key passes per 90
2.83
Average shot distance
19.1m
From set pieces
58%
How the chances arrive
Crosses
0%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
0%
Club role
Nottingham Forest
What they are for
PenaltiesTakes them: 1 of 1 Nottingham Forest were awarded.
Open-play crosses5 crosses from open play became shots, worth 1.39 xG.
Corners and set piecesSupplies 9% of Nottingham Forest’s dead-ball danger, from 5 deliveries that became shots.
On the pitch100% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Morgan Gibbs-White’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
James McAtee0.4 xG3 shots, 0g
Daniel Muñoz0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Xaver Schlager0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Dan Ndoye1.2 xG4 shots, 1g
Igor Jesus0.9 xG2 shots, 1g
Chris Wood0.4 xG1 shot, 0g
Liam Delap0.2 xG3 shots, 0g
Xaver Schlager0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Season record
2026/27
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Morgan Gibbs-White carries 7.7%of Nottingham Forest’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.371
54% of midfielders
Possession value per 900.785
81% of midfielders
Ranked against 52 midfielders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
6 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
v Leeds3 shots 0 on target
1g
at Liverpool1 shot 1 on target
v Spurs3 shots 0 on target
at Villa2 shots 1 on target
at Palace2 shots 0 on target
1 blankno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so one sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.
