+1.46goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.3214% of Nottingham Forest’s build-up value
league 0.27
Morgan Gibbs-White ranks 107th of 397 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 17.5m on average, with 35% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 15% of Nottingham Forest’s attacking involvement, the largest share in the squad.
75% chance. Muscular injury - 75% chance of playing. Weigh the rates below against the chance he features at all. Club status as of 17 Oct 2026.
Against their position
137 midfielders
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.2284th
Non-penalty goals
0.2284th
xG
0.1981st
Non-penalty xG
0.1982nd
Shots
1.9185th
npxG per shot
0.1065th
Shot distance
17.5m73rd
Set-piece share
35%78th
Goals against xG
+0.991st
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.2592nd
Expected assists
0.1975th
Key passes
1.6078th
npxG + xA
0.3881st
xG chain
0.5678th
xG build-up
0.3268th
Assists against xA
+1.995th
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Defending
per 90
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
9season count
Red cards
1season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Ranked against 137 midfielders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.
This week
Gameweek 7
Next fixture
Gameweek 7
vsArsenal
Sun 18 Oct, 15:30 UTC
Arsenal concede 9.6 shots a match and are 0.77× the league norm against midfielders. A difficult one.
Projected shots
1.44
1.91 per 90 × 0.75
Projected on target
0.47
0.66 per 90 × 0.71
Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.
Shots
34 appearances
Over 0.527 of 3479%± 7
Over 1.518 of 3453%± 9
Over 2.511 of 3432%± 8
Over 3.54 of 3412%± 6
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 7 of 34.
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals
Morgan Gibbs-White, 2024/25, 61 shots in the final 35m, 7 scored.
left
18%
Centre
64%
right
18%
share of their shooting xG
Chance profile
quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.101
Shots per 90
1.91
Key passes per 90
1.60
Average shot distance
17.5m
From set pieces
35%
How the chances arrive
Crosses
2%
Through balls
11%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
4%
Club role
Nottingham Forest
What they are for
Corners and set piecesSupplies 9% of Nottingham Forest’s dead-ball danger, from 7 deliveries that became shots.
When it mattered5 of 7 goals came with the game level or Nottingham Forest behind.
On the pitch84% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Morgan Gibbs-White’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Anthony Elanga1.1 xG10 shots, 3g
Callum Hudson-Odoi0.5 xG10 shots, 1g
Chris Wood0.5 xG6 shots, 1g
Nicolás Domínguez0.3 xG4 shots, 0g
Elliot Anderson0.2 xG6 shots, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Chris Wood1.8 xG9 shots, 3g
Anthony Elanga1.2 xG6 shots, 1g
Nikola Milenkovic0.7 xG4 shots, 1g
Nicolás Domínguez0.6 xG2 shots, 0g
Jota Silva0.4 xG3 shots, 1g
Season record
2024/25
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Morgan Gibbs-White carries 13.7%of Nottingham Forest’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.318
67% of midfielders
Possession value per 900.563
77% of midfielders
Ranked against 137 midfielders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
34 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
v Bournemouth2 shots 0 on target
1g
at Southampton4 shots 2 on target
v Wolves3 shots 2 on target
at Liverpool1 shot 0 on target
at Brighton1 shot 1 on target
at Chelsea2 shots 1 on target
v West Ham1 shot 0 on target
v Newcastle1 shot 0 on target
v Ipswich3 shots 2 on target
at Man City1 shot 1 on target
1g
at Man Utd2 shots 1 on target
v Villa2 shots 1 on target
v Spurs1 shot 1 on target
1g
at Everton2 shots 1 on target
1g
at Wolves1 shot 1 on target
v Southampton2 shots 0 on target
at Bournemouth3 shots 0 on target
1g
v Brighton3 shots 1 on target
at Newcastle4 shots 1 on target
v Man City4 shots 0 on target
v Man Utd1 shot 0 on target
at Villa3 shots 0 on target
v Everton3 shots 1 on target
at Spurs2 shots 1 on target
v Brentford1 shot 0 on target
1g
v Leicester5 shots 1 on target
1g
at West Ham3 shots 2 on target
7 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 7 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.
