-0.24goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.4010% of Chelsea’s build-up value
league 0.27
Levi Colwill ranks 268th of 397 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 11.1m on average, with 85% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 2% of Chelsea’s attacking involvement, the 13th largest share in the squad.
Against their position
123 defenders
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.0673rd
Non-penalty goals
0.0673rd
xG
0.0778th
Non-penalty xG
0.0778th
Shots
0.4952nd
npxG per shot
0.1588th
Shot distance
11.1m73rd
Set-piece share
85%66th
Goals against xG
-0.535th
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.0356th
Expected assists
0.0343rd
Key passes
0.3443rd
npxG + xA
0.1052nd
xG chain
0.4372nd
xG build-up
0.4073rd
Assists against xA
-0.169th
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Defending
per 90
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
9season count
Red cards
0season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Ranked against 123 defenders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.
This week
Gameweek 8
Next fixture
Gameweek 8
vsTottenham
Sat 24 Oct, 16:30 UTC
Tottenham concede 13.8 shots a match and are 1.27× the league norm against defenders. A favourable draw.
Projected shots
0.57
0.49 per 90 × 1.17
Projected on target
0.12
0.11 per 90 × 1.07
Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.
Shots
35 appearances
Over 0.512 of 3534%± 8
Over 1.53 of 359%± 5
Over 2.51 of 353%± 3
Over 3.51 of 353%± 3
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 23 of 35.
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals
Levi Colwill, 2024/25, 17 shots in the final 35m, 2 scored.
left
8%
Centre
25%
right
67%
share of their shooting xG
Chance profile
quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.146
Shots per 90
0.49
Key passes per 90
0.34
Average shot distance
11.1m
From set pieces
85%
How the chances arrive
Crosses
92%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
96%
Club role
Chelsea
What they are for
On the pitch92% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Levi Colwill’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Pedro Neto0.8 xG3 shots, 2g
Cole Palmer0.6 xG3 shots, 0g
Noni Madueke0.3 xG1 shot, 0g
Enzo Fernández0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Reece James0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Christopher Nkunku0.6 xG1 shot, 0g
Cole Palmer0.2 xG4 shots, 1g
Noni Madueke0.1 xG3 shots, 0g
Enzo Fernández0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Moisés Caicedo0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
Season record
2024/25
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Levi Colwill carries 10.4%of Chelsea’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.396
72% of defenders
Possession value per 900.433
72% of defenders
Ranked against 123 defenders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
35 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
v Palace2 shots 1 on target
at Man Utd1 shot 0 on target
at Spurs1 shot 0 on target
v Bournemouth1 shot 0 on target
at Man City1 shot 0 on target
v West Ham1 shot 0 on target
at Villa1 shot 0 on target
1g
v Southampton1 shot 1 on target
v Leicester1 shot 0 on target
v Ipswich4 shots 1 on target
at Fulham2 shots 0 on target
1g
at Forest1 shot 1 on target
23 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 23 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.
