Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Levi Colwill

Defender23 yrs
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.041 non-penalty goals from 11 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.061 assists, 7 key passes
Finishing
+0.26goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.364% of Chelsea’s build-up value

Levi Colwill ranks 280th of 402 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 12.5m on average, with 74% of their danger coming from set pieces.

Against their position

135 defenders

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.05
Non-penalty goals
0.05
xG
0.04
Non-penalty xG
0.04
Shots
0.55
npxG per shot
0.07
Shot distance
12.5m
Set-piece share
74%
Goals against xG
+0.2

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.05
Expected assists
0.06
Key passes
0.35
npxG + xA
0.10
xG chain
0.40
xG build-up
0.36
Assists against xA
-0.2

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
2season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Ranked against 135 defenders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Gameweek 8

Next fixture

Gameweek 8

vs Tottenham

Sat 24 Oct, 16:30 UTC

Tottenham concede 12.9 shots a match and are 1.08× the league norm against defenders. Roughly an average matchup.

Projected shots
0.55

0.55 per 90 × 1.01

Projected on target
0.14

0.15 per 90 × 0.92

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

23 appearances
  • Over 0.58 of 2335%± 10
  • Over 1.53 of 2313%± 7
  • Over 2.50 of 230%± 0
  • Over 3.50 of 230%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 15 of 23.

Shooting profile

11 shots

Where they shoot

11 shots
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Levi Colwill, 2023/24, 11 shots in the final 35m, 1 scored.

left
23%
Centre
74%
right
2%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.071
Shots per 90
0.55
Key passes per 90
0.35
Average shot distance
12.5m
From set pieces
74%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
0%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
0%

Club role

Chelsea

What they are for

  • On the pitch53% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Levi Colwill’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Nicolas Jackson0.1 xG1 shot, 1g
  2. Mykhailo Mudryk0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
  3. Ben Chilwell0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Thiago Silva0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
  5. Enzo Fernández0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Nicolas Jackson0.8 xG3 shots, 0g
  2. Mykhailo Mudryk0.4 xG2 shots, 1g
  3. Enzo Fernández0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Raheem Sterling0.1 xG1 shot, 0g

Season record

2023/24

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Levi Colwill carries 3.9% of Chelsea’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.355
    68% of defenders
  • Possession value per 900.402
    67% of defenders

Ranked against 135 defenders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

23 appearances, oldest first

v Liverpool1 shot
0 on target

at West Ham2 shots
0 on target

v Luton1 shot
0 on target

at Bournemouth2 shots
2 on target

1g

v Brighton1 shot
1 on target

at Man Utd2 shots
0 on target

at Everton1 shot
0 on target

v Fulham1 shot
0 on target

15 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 15 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.