Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Jean-Ricner Bellegarde

Forward
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.061 non-penalty goals from 21 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.091 assists, 13 key passes
Finishing
+0.23goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.257% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ build-up value

Jean-Ricner Bellegarde ranks 237th of 398 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 23.2m on average. They carry 5% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ attacking involvement, the 11th largest share in the squad.

Against their position

109 forwards

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.07
Non-penalty goals
0.07
xG
0.06
Non-penalty xG
0.06
Shots
1.49
npxG per shot
0.04
Shot distance
23.2m
Set-piece share
17%
Goals against xG
+0.1

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.07
Expected assists
0.09
Key passes
0.92
npxG + xA
0.15
xG chain
0.37
xG build-up
0.25
Assists against xA
-0.2

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
5season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Ranked against 109 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Next match

Shots

26 appearances
  • Over 0.515 of 2658%± 10
  • Over 1.55 of 2619%± 8
  • Over 2.51 of 264%± 4
  • Over 3.50 of 260%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 11 of 26.

Shooting profile

21 shots

Where they shoot

21 shots
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Jean-Ricner Bellegarde, 2025/26, 21 shots in the final 35m, 1 scored.

left
50%
Centre
26%
right
25%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.041
Shots per 90
1.49
Key passes per 90
0.92
Average shot distance
23.2m
From set pieces
17%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
0%
Through balls
25%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
10%

Club role

Wolverhampton Wanderers

What they are for

  • On the pitch37% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Jean-Ricner Bellegarde’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. David Møller Wolfe0.1 xG2 shots, 1g
  2. Ladislav Krejcí0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  3. Jørgen Strand Larsen0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Mateus Mané0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  5. João Gomes0.1 xG2 shots, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Tolu Arokodare0.3 xG2 shots, 0g
  2. Hee-Chan Hwang0.3 xG1 shot, 0g
  3. Adam Armstrong0.2 xG3 shots, 1g
  4. Jørgen Strand Larsen0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  5. João Gomes0.1 xG1 shot, 0g

Season record

2025/26

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Jean-Ricner Bellegarde carries 6.9% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.249
    77% of forwards
  • Possession value per 900.369
    21% of forwards

Ranked against 109 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

26 appearances, oldest first

v Man City1 shot
0 on target

at Bournemouth1 shot
0 on target

v Everton2 shots
1 on target

at Newcastle1 shot
0 on target

at Spurs1 shot
0 on target

v Burnley2 shots
1 on target

at Fulham2 shots
1 on target

at Chelsea1 shot
0 on target

at Villa1 shot
0 on target

v Forest1 shot
0 on target

1g

v Man Utd2 shots
1 on target

v Bournemouth1 shot
0 on target

at Forest1 shot
0 on target

at Palace3 shots
3 on target

at West Ham1 shot
0 on target

11 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 11 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.