Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Jean-Ricner Bellegarde

Forward
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.132 non-penalty goals from 15 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.091 assists, 12 key passes
Finishing
+0.70goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.152% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ build-up value

Jean-Ricner Bellegarde ranks 172nd of 402 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 16.7m on average. They carry 3% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ attacking involvement, the 12th largest share in the squad.

Against their position

107 forwards

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.19
Non-penalty goals
0.19
xG
0.13
Non-penalty xG
0.13
Shots
1.44
npxG per shot
0.09
Shot distance
16.7m
Set-piece share
4%
Goals against xG
+0.6

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.10
Expected assists
0.09
Key passes
1.15
npxG + xA
0.22
xG chain
0.30
xG build-up
0.15
Assists against xA
+0.0

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
0season count
Red cards
1season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Ranked against 107 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Next match

Shots

22 appearances
  • Over 0.510 of 2245%± 11
  • Over 1.53 of 2214%± 7
  • Over 2.52 of 229%± 6
  • Over 3.50 of 220%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 12 of 22.

Shooting profile

15 shots

Where they shoot

15 shots
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Jean-Ricner Bellegarde, 2023/24, 15 shots in the final 35m, 2 scored.

left
37%
Centre
60%
right
3%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.091
Shots per 90
1.44
Key passes per 90
1.15
Average shot distance
16.7m
From set pieces
4%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
0%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
14%
Headed
4%

Club role

Wolverhampton Wanderers

What they are for

  • On the pitch27% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Jean-Ricner Bellegarde’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Matheus Cunha0.4 xG2 shots, 1g
  2. Hugo Bueno0.2 xG2 shots, 0g
  3. João Gomes0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Rayan Ait Nouri0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  5. Hee-Chan Hwang0.1 xG1 shot, 1g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Matheus Cunha0.5 xG3 shots, 1g
  2. Pedro Neto0.2 xG3 shots, 0g
  3. Hee-Chan Hwang0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Mario Lemina0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  5. Pablo Sarabia0.1 xG1 shot, 0g

Season record

2023/24

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Jean-Ricner Bellegarde carries 2.1% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.146
    34% of forwards
  • Possession value per 900.305
    4% of forwards

Ranked against 107 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

22 appearances, oldest first

v Liverpool1 shot
0 on target

1g

at Sheffield Utd1 shot
1 on target

v Spurs1 shot
0 on target

at West Ham3 shots
0 on target

1g

at Brentford2 shots
2 on target

at Chelsea1 shot
1 on target

v Brentford1 shot
0 on target

at Spurs1 shot
0 on target

at Newcastle3 shots
1 on target

at Man City1 shot
0 on target

12 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 12 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.