-0.12goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.199% of West Ham’s build-up value
league 0.28
Tomas Soucek ranks 138th of 402 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 10.9m on average, with 29% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 12% of West Ham’s attacking involvement, the 3rd largest share in the squad.
Against their position
128 midfielders
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.2287th
Non-penalty goals
0.2289th
xG
0.2389th
Non-penalty xG
0.2392nd
Shots
1.3160th
npxG per shot
0.1898th
Shot distance
10.9m98th
Set-piece share
29%65th
Goals against xG
-0.545th
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.0648th
Expected assists
0.0731st
Key passes
0.6226th
npxG + xA
0.3072nd
xG chain
0.3839th
xG build-up
0.1921st
Assists against xA
-0.163rd
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Defending
per 90
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
7season count
Red cards
0season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Ranked against 128 midfielders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.
This week
Next match
Shots
37 appearances
Over 0.520 of 3754%± 8
Over 1.511 of 3730%± 8
Over 2.56 of 3716%± 6
Over 3.53 of 378%± 4
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 17 of 37.
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals
Tomas Soucek, 2023/24, 42 shots in the final 35m, 7 scored.
left
7%
Centre
88%
right
5%
share of their shooting xG
Chance profile
quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.178
Shots per 90
1.31
Key passes per 90
0.62
Average shot distance
10.9m
From set pieces
29%
How the chances arrive
Crosses
4%
Through balls
14%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
20%
Club role
West Ham
What they are for
Corners and set piecesSupplies 6% of West Ham’s dead-ball danger, from 4 deliveries that became shots.
When it mattered6 of 7 goals came with the game level or West Ham behind.
On the pitch84% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Tomas Soucek’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Jarrod Bowen1.7 xG5 shots, 1g
James Ward-Prowse1.2 xG10 shots, 1g
Lucas Paquetá0.9 xG5 shots, 0g
Emerson0.7 xG2 shots, 1g
Mohammed Kudus0.6 xG4 shots, 2g
Chances created
who they supply
Michail Antonio1.2 xG5 shots, 1g
Danny Ings0.3 xG1 shot, 0g
Mohammed Kudus0.2 xG6 shots, 0g
Jarrod Bowen0.1 xG4 shots, 1g
Naif Aguerd0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Season record
2023/24
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Tomas Soucek carries 9.5%of West Ham’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.188
21% of midfielders
Possession value per 900.378
38% of midfielders
Ranked against 128 midfielders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
37 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
at Bournemouth2 shots 0 on target
at Liverpool3 shots 1 on target
1g
v Sheffield Utd6 shots 2 on target
1g
v Newcastle1 shot 1 on target
at Villa2 shots 0 on target
1g
v Forest4 shots 3 on target
1g
at Burnley4 shots 2 on target
v Man Utd1 shot 0 on target
1g
at Arsenal1 shot 1 on target
v Brighton1 shot 0 on target
v Bournemouth3 shots 0 on target
at Man Utd2 shots 0 on target
v Brentford2 shots 0 on target
1g
at Everton1 shot 1 on target
v Burnley2 shots 1 on target
v Villa1 shot 0 on target
v Spurs1 shot 0 on target
v Liverpool1 shot 1 on target
at Chelsea1 shot 0 on target
1g
v Luton3 shots 2 on target
17 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 17 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.
