Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Fulham

Timothy Castagne

Defender30 yrs
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.020 non-penalty goals from 8 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.051 assists, 10 key passes
Finishing
-0.33goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.314% of Fulham’s build-up value

Timothy Castagne ranks 308th of 397 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 15.6m on average, with 34% of their danger coming from set pieces.

Against their position

123 defenders

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.00
Non-penalty goals
0.00
xG
0.02
Non-penalty xG
0.02
Shots
0.44
npxG per shot
–not ranked
Shot distance
–not ranked
Set-piece share
–not ranked
Goals against xG
-0.4

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.06
Expected assists
0.05
Key passes
0.55
npxG + xA
0.07
xG chain
0.36
xG build-up
0.31
Assists against xA
+0.1

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
1season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Ranked against 123 defenders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Gameweek 8

Next fixture

Gameweek 8

away to Coventry

Sat 24 Oct, 14:00 UTC

No shot record for Coventry in this season, so no opponent adjustment is possible. Newly promoted sides have no Premier League history to measure.

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

24 appearances
  • Over 0.56 of 2425%± 9
  • Over 1.52 of 248%± 6
  • Over 2.50 of 240%± 0
  • Over 3.50 of 240%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 18 of 24.

Shooting profile

8 shots

Where they shoot

8 shots
Every shotBy zone
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Timothy Castagne, 2024/25, 8 shots in the final 35m, 0 scored.

left
5%
Centre
18%
right
77%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.045
Shots per 90
0.44
Key passes per 90
0.55
Average shot distance
15.6m
From set pieces
34%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
0%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
9%

Club role

Fulham

What they are for

  • On the pitch48% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Timothy Castagne’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Alex Iwobi0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
  2. Andreas Pereira0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
  3. Willian0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Sander Berge0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Harry Wilson0.4 xG3 shots, 1g
  2. Rodrigo Muniz0.2 xG2 shots, 0g
  3. Alex Iwobi0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Raúl Jiménez0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
  5. Ryan Sessegnon0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Season record

2024/25

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Timothy Castagne carries 4.4% of Fulham’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.309
    57% of defenders
  • Possession value per 900.365
    59% of defenders

Ranked against 123 defenders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

24 appearances, oldest first

v Brentford2 shots
1 on target

at Chelsea1 shot
0 on target

v Bournemouth1 shot
1 on target

v Forest1 shot
0 on target

at Brighton2 shots
0 on target

v Spurs1 shot
1 on target

18 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 18 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.