-1.94goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.339% of Brentford’s build-up value
league 0.27
Sepp van den Berg ranks 253rd of 397 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 11.0m on average, with 59% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 2% of Brentford’s attacking involvement, the 12th largest share in the squad.
Against their position
123 defenders
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.0028th
Non-penalty goals
0.0028th
xG
0.0779th
Non-penalty xG
0.0779th
Shots
0.6973rd
npxG per shot
0.1162nd
Shot distance
11.0m76th
Set-piece share
59%38th
Goals against xG
-2.10th
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.0026th
Expected assists
0.0449th
Key passes
0.2431st
npxG + xA
0.1161st
xG chain
0.4065th
xG build-up
0.3363rd
Assists against xA
-1.014th
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Defending
per 90
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
3season count
Red cards
0season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Ranked against 123 defenders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.
This week
Gameweek 8
Next fixture
Gameweek 8
away toHull
Sun 25 Oct, 14:00 UTC
No shot record for Hull in this season, so no opponent adjustment is possible. Newly promoted sides have no Premier League history to measure.
Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.
Shots
31 appearances
Over 0.516 of 3152%± 9
Over 1.54 of 3113%± 6
Over 2.50 of 310%± 0
Over 3.50 of 310%± 0
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 15 of 31.
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals
Sepp van den Berg, 2024/25, 20 shots in the final 35m, 0 scored.
left
24%
Centre
69%
right
6%
share of their shooting xG
Chance profile
quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.107
Shots per 90
0.69
Key passes per 90
0.24
Average shot distance
11.0m
From set pieces
59%
How the chances arrive
Crosses
44%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
74%
Club role
Brentford
What they are for
On the pitch76% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Sepp van den Berg’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Keane Lewis-Potter0.7 xG3 shots, 0g
Mikkel Damsgaard0.6 xG3 shots, 0g
Vitaly Janelt0.3 xG1 shot, 0g
Ethan Pinnock0.2 xG3 shots, 0g
Michael Kayode0.2 xG4 shots, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Yoane Wissa0.6 xG1 shot, 0g
Christian Nørgaard0.3 xG2 shots, 0g
Kevin Schade0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Mikkel Damsgaard0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Season record
2024/25
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Sepp van den Berg carries 9.0%of Brentford’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.335
63% of defenders
Possession value per 900.399
64% of defenders
Ranked against 123 defenders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
31 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
v West Ham1 shot 0 on target
v Wolves2 shots 1 on target
v Ipswich2 shots 2 on target
v Bournemouth2 shots 0 on target
at Everton1 shot 0 on target
v Man City1 shot 0 on target
v Liverpool1 shot 0 on target
at Palace1 shot 0 on target
v Spurs1 shot 1 on target
v Chelsea1 shot 0 on target
v Brighton1 shot 0 on target
at Forest1 shot 1 on target
v Man Utd1 shot 0 on target
at Ipswich1 shot 0 on target
v Fulham2 shots 0 on target
at Wolves1 shot 1 on target
15 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 15 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.
