-0.60goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.453% of Nottingham Forest’s build-up value
league 0.24
Ryan Yates ranks 238th of 398 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 18.2m on average, with 58% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 2% of Nottingham Forest’s attacking involvement, the 13th largest share in the squad.
Against their position
142 midfielders
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.0013th
Non-penalty goals
0.0013th
xG
0.1162nd
Non-penalty xG
0.1163rd
Shots
1.4776th
npxG per shot
–not ranked
Shot distance
–not ranked
Set-piece share
–not ranked
Goals against xG
-0.731st
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.3397th
Expected assists
0.0411th
Key passes
0.8240th
npxG + xA
0.1531st
xG chain
0.5479th
xG build-up
0.4591st
Assists against xA
+1.897th
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Defending
per 90
Recoveries
2.692nd
Defensive contribution
10.3279th
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
3season count
Red cards
0season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Ranked against 142 midfielders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end. Recoveries and defensive contribution come from the FPL feed and are ranked in its own positions.
This week
Gameweek 7
Next fixture
Gameweek 7
vsArsenal
Sun 18 Oct, 15:30 UTC
Arsenal concede 8.3 shots a match and are 0.69× the league norm against midfielders. A difficult one.
Projected shots
0.99
1.47 per 90 × 0.67
Projected on target
0.09
0.16 per 90 × 0.57
Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.
Shots
22 appearances
Over 0.57 of 2232%± 10
Over 1.51 of 225%± 4
Over 2.51 of 225%± 4
Over 3.50 of 220%± 0
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 15 of 22.
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals
Ryan Yates, 2025/26, 9 shots in the final 35m, 0 scored.
left
7%
Centre
27%
right
67%
share of their shooting xG
Chance profile
quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.075
Shots per 90
1.47
Key passes per 90
0.82
Average shot distance
18.2m
From set pieces
58%
How the chances arrive
Crosses
43%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
8%
Headed
19%
Club role
Nottingham Forest
What they are for
On the pitch16% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Ryan Yates’output.
Chances received
who supplies them
Elliot Anderson0.3 xG1 shot, 0g
Dan Ndoye0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Omari Hutchinson0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Morgan Gibbs-White0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Morgan Gibbs-White0.1 xG2 shots, 2g
James McAtee0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
Igor Jesus0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
Ola Aina0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
Season record
2025/26
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Ryan Yates carries 3.1%of Nottingham Forest’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.454
91% of midfielders
Possession value per 900.538
78% of midfielders
Ranked against 142 midfielders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
22 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
at Newcastle1 shot 1 on target
v Palace1 shot 0 on target
at Leeds1 shot 0 on target
at Man City1 shot 0 on target
v Fulham1 shot 0 on target
v Newcastle3 shots 0 on target
v Bournemouth1 shot 0 on target
15 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 15 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.
