-1.20goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.549% of Liverpool’s build-up value
league 0.27
Ryan Gravenberch ranks 263rd of 397 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 24.0m on average, with 54% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 6% of Liverpool’s attacking involvement, the 7th largest share in the squad.
Against their position
137 midfielders
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.0015th
Non-penalty goals
0.0016th
xG
0.0427th
Non-penalty xG
0.0427th
Shots
0.5622nd
npxG per shot
0.0734th
Shot distance
24.0m11th
Set-piece share
54%86th
Goals against xG
-1.311th
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.1156th
Expected assists
0.0732nd
Key passes
0.7337th
npxG + xA
0.1125th
xG chain
0.6081st
xG build-up
0.5493rd
Assists against xA
+1.692nd
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Defending
per 90
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
6season count
Red cards
1season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Ranked against 137 midfielders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.
This week
Gameweek 8
Next fixture
Gameweek 8
vsBrighton
Sun 25 Oct, 14:00 UTC
Brighton concede 11.3 shots a match and are 0.84× the league norm against midfielders. A difficult one.
Projected shots
0.48
0.56 per 90 × 0.85
Projected on target
0.12
0.14 per 90 × 0.87
Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.
Shots
37 appearances
Over 0.517 of 3746%± 8
Over 1.53 of 378%± 4
Over 2.50 of 370%± 0
Over 3.50 of 370%± 0
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 20 of 37.
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals
Ryan Gravenberch, 2024/25, 20 shots in the final 35m, 0 scored.
left
17%
Centre
67%
right
16%
share of their shooting xG
Chance profile
quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.067
Shots per 90
0.56
Key passes per 90
0.73
Average shot distance
24.0m
From set pieces
54%
How the chances arrive
Crosses
0%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
24%
Headed
0%
Club role
Liverpool
What they are for
On the pitch94% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Ryan Gravenberch’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Mohamed Salah0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Cody Gakpo0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Luis Díaz0.1 xG3 shots, 0g
Trent Alexander-Arnold0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Curtis Jones0.0 xG2 shots, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Diogo Jota0.5 xG2 shots, 0g
Cody Gakpo0.5 xG3 shots, 0g
Darwin Núñez0.4 xG5 shots, 0g
Mohamed Salah0.3 xG2 shots, 1g
Luis Díaz0.3 xG4 shots, 0g
Season record
2024/25
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Ryan Gravenberch carries 9.5%of Liverpool’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.545
93% of midfielders
Possession value per 900.602
81% of midfielders
Ranked against 137 midfielders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
37 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
v Forest1 shot 1 on target
v Bournemouth1 shot 1 on target
at Palace1 shot 0 on target
at Arsenal1 shot 0 on target
v Brighton1 shot 0 on target
v Villa1 shot 0 on target
at Southampton1 shot 0 on target
v Man Utd2 shots 0 on target
at Forest2 shots 0 on target
at Brentford1 shot 1 on target
at Bournemouth1 shot 0 on target
v Everton2 shots 1 on target
v West Ham1 shot 0 on target
at Leicester1 shot 0 on target
v Spurs1 shot 1 on target
v Arsenal1 shot 0 on target
at Brighton1 shot 0 on target
20 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 20 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.
