-1.09goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.2610% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ build-up value
league 0.28
Rayan Ait Nouri ranks 177th of 402 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 17.6m on average, with 29% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 8% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ attacking involvement, the 6th largest share in the squad.
Against their position
128 midfielders
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.0853rd
Non-penalty goals
0.0853rd
xG
0.1264th
Non-penalty xG
0.1264th
Shots
0.8732nd
npxG per shot
0.1494th
Shot distance
17.6m72nd
Set-piece share
29%66th
Goals against xG
-1.215th
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.0437th
Expected assists
0.0946th
Key passes
0.9447th
npxG + xA
0.2154th
xG chain
0.4043rd
xG build-up
0.2643rd
Assists against xA
-1.418th
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Defending
per 90
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
7season count
Red cards
0season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Ranked against 128 midfielders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.
This week
Gameweek 8
Next fixture
Gameweek 8
away toAston Villa
Sat 24 Oct, 11:30 UTC
Aston Villa concede 12.1 shots a match and are 0.86× the league norm against midfielders. A difficult one.
Projected shots
0.75
0.87 per 90 × 0.86
Projected on target
0.25
0.26 per 90 × 0.95
Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.
Shots
33 appearances
Over 0.516 of 3348%± 9
Over 1.57 of 3321%± 7
Over 2.50 of 330%± 0
Over 3.50 of 330%± 0
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 17 of 33.
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals
Rayan Ait Nouri, 2023/24, 23 shots in the final 35m, 2 scored.
left
36%
Centre
42%
right
22%
share of their shooting xG
Chance profile
quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.141
Shots per 90
0.87
Key passes per 90
0.94
Average shot distance
17.6m
From set pieces
29%
How the chances arrive
Crosses
5%
Through balls
3%
Own dribble
15%
Headed
3%
Club role
Wolverhampton Wanderers
What they are for
On the pitch70% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Rayan Ait Nouri’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Hee-Chan Hwang0.6 xG3 shots, 0g
Toti0.6 xG1 shot, 1g
Max Kilman0.4 xG3 shots, 0g
Pablo Sarabia0.3 xG2 shots, 1g
Pedro Neto0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Matheus Cunha0.8 xG6 shots, 0g
Pablo Sarabia0.5 xG4 shots, 1g
Mario Lemina0.5 xG5 shots, 0g
Hee-Chan Hwang0.1 xG3 shots, 0g
Pedro Neto0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Season record
2023/24
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Rayan Ait Nouri carries 9.6%of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ build-up value.
Build-up per 900.261
43% of midfielders
Possession value per 900.403
43% of midfielders
Ranked against 128 midfielders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
33 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
v Brighton1 shot 0 on target
v Villa1 shot 0 on target
at Bournemouth1 shot 0 on target
v Newcastle1 shot 0 on target
at Sheffield Utd2 shots 0 on target
v Spurs2 shots 0 on target
v Everton1 shot 0 on target
at Chelsea1 shot 0 on target
v Brentford2 shots 0 on target
at Spurs1 shot 1 on target
1g
v Fulham2 shots 2 on target
at Villa1 shot 1 on target
1g
at Burnley2 shots 2 on target
v West Ham2 shots 0 on target
v Bournemouth2 shots 0 on target
v Palace1 shot 1 on target
17 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 17 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.
