Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Brighton

Olivier Boscagli

Left-back28 yrs
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.010 non-penalty goals from 3 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.170 assists, 8 key passes
Finishing
-0.06goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.4011% of Brighton’s build-up value

Olivier Boscagli ranks 68th of 138 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 35.9m on average, with 60% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 7% of Brighton’s attacking involvement, the 6th largest share in the squad.

Against their position

87 midfielders

Average match rating6.97

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.00
Non-penalty goals
0.00
xG
0.01
Non-penalty xG
0.01
Shots
0.53
Shots on target
0.33
Shot accuracy
–not ranked
npxG per shot
–not ranked
Shot distance
–not ranked
Set-piece share
–not ranked
Goals against xG
-0.1

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.00
Expected assists
0.17
Key passes
1.41
npxG + xA
0.18
xG chain
0.43
xG build-up
0.40
Assists against xA
-0.9

On the ball

per 90
Touches
88.67
Passes
70.67
Pass completion
86%
Take-ons attempted
0.00
Take-on success
–not ranked
Dispossessed
0.00

Defending

per 90
Tackles
1.33
Tackles won
–not ranked
Interceptions
1.00
Clearances
2.67
Aerials won
1.67
Aerial success
45%
Dribbled past
1.00

Discipline

per 90
Fouls committed
1.67
Caught offside
0.00
Errors
0season count
Yellow cards
2season count
Red cards
0season count

Ranked against 87 midfielders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Gameweek 7

Next fixture

Gameweek 7

vs Crystal Palace

Sun 18 Oct, 13:00 UTC

Crystal Palace concede 18.2 shots a match and are 1.39× the league norm against full-backs (16 shots so far). A favourable draw.

Projected shots
0.72

0.53 per 90 × 1.35

Projected on target
0.22

0.18 per 90 × 1.24

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

6 appearances
  • Over 0.53 of 650%± 20
  • Over 1.50 of 60%± 0
  • Over 2.50 of 60%± 0
  • Over 3.50 of 60%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 3 of 6.

Shooting profile

3 shots

Where they shoot

3 shots
Every shotBy zone
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Olivier Boscagli, 2026/27, 2 shots in the final 35m, 0 scored.

left
0%
Centre
100%
right
0%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.022
Shots per 90
0.53
Key passes per 90
1.41
Average shot distance
35.9m
From set pieces
60%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
0%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
0%

Club role

Brighton

What they are for

  • Corners and set piecesSupplies 22% of Brighton’s dead-ball danger, from 4 deliveries that became shots.
  • On the pitch94% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Olivier Boscagli’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Malick Yalcouyé0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Promise David0.5 xG1 shot, 0g
  2. Pascal Struijk0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  3. Diego Gómez0.1 xG3 shots, 0g
  4. Pascal Groß0.0 xG2 shots, 0g
  5. Malick Yalcouyé0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Season record

2026/27

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Olivier Boscagli carries 10.6% of Brighton’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.405
    69% of midfielders
  • Possession value per 900.427
    19% of midfielders

Ranked against 52 midfielders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

6 appearances, oldest first

at Chelsea1 shot
1 on target

at Coventry1 shot
0 on target

v Arsenal1 shot
0 on target

3 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 3 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.