-0.45goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.219% of Nottingham Forest’s build-up value
league 0.24
Nikola Milenkovic ranks 367th of 398 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 20.1m on average, with 86% of their danger coming from set pieces.
75% chance. Knee injury - 75% chance of playing. Weigh the rates below against the chance he features at all. Club status as of 17 Oct 2026.
Against their position
119 defenders
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.0026th
Non-penalty goals
0.0026th
xG
0.0115th
Non-penalty xG
0.0116th
Shots
0.4036th
npxG per shot
0.031st
Shot distance
20.1m21st
Set-piece share
86%63rd
Goals against xG
-0.538th
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.0025th
Expected assists
0.0110th
Key passes
0.087th
npxG + xA
0.024th
xG chain
0.2226th
xG build-up
0.2143rd
Assists against xA
-0.342nd
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Defending
per 90
Recoveries
2.8515th
Defensive contribution
8.2962nd
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
6season count
Red cards
0season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Ranked against 119 defenders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end. Recoveries and defensive contribution come from the FPL feed and are ranked in its own positions.
This week
Gameweek 7
Next fixture
Gameweek 7
vsArsenal
Sun 18 Oct, 15:30 UTC
Arsenal concede 8.3 shots a match and are 0.61× the league norm against defenders. A difficult one.
Projected shots
0.26
0.40 per 90 × 0.64
Projected on target
0.02
0.03 per 90 × 0.57
Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.
Shots
38 appearances
Over 0.511 of 3829%± 7
Over 1.55 of 3813%± 5
Over 2.50 of 380%± 0
Over 3.50 of 380%± 0
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 27 of 38.
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals
Nikola Milenkovic, 2025/26, 15 shots in the final 35m, 0 scored.
left
18%
Centre
75%
right
7%
share of their shooting xG
Chance profile
quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.034
Shots per 90
0.40
Key passes per 90
0.08
Average shot distance
20.1m
From set pieces
86%
How the chances arrive
Crosses
44%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
0%
Club role
Nottingham Forest
What they are for
On the pitch98% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Nikola Milenkovic’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Elliot Anderson0.2 xG6 shots, 0g
Neco Williams0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Douglas Luiz0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Callum Hudson-Odoi0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
Nicolás Domínguez0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Chris Wood0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Nicolás Domínguez0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Neco Williams0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
Season record
2025/26
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Nikola Milenkovic carries 8.9%of Nottingham Forest’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.214
43% of defenders
Possession value per 900.216
26% of defenders
Ranked against 119 defenders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
38 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
v West Ham1 shot 0 on target
v Sunderland1 shot 0 on target
v Chelsea2 shots 1 on target
v Man Utd2 shots 0 on target
v Brighton2 shots 0 on target
at Everton2 shots 0 on target
v Spurs1 shot 0 on target
v Man City1 shot 0 on target
v Wolves1 shot 0 on target
v Liverpool2 shots 0 on target
at Man Utd1 shot 0 on target
27 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 27 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.