Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Southampton

Nathan Wood

Defender
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.030 non-penalty goals from 2 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.000 assists, 1 key pass
Finishing
-0.26goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.273% of Southampton’s build-up value

Nathan Wood ranks 347th of 397 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 8.4m on average, with 100% of their danger coming from set pieces.

Against their position

123 defenders

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.00
Non-penalty goals
0.00
xG
0.03
Non-penalty xG
0.03
Shots
0.23
npxG per shot
–not ranked
Shot distance
–not ranked
Set-piece share
–not ranked
Goals against xG
-0.3

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.00
Expected assists
0.00
Key passes
0.12
npxG + xA
0.04
xG chain
0.27
xG build-up
0.27
Assists against xA
-0.0

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
2season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Ranked against 123 defenders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Next match

Shots

11 appearances
  • Over 0.52 of 1118%± 12
  • Over 1.50 of 110%± 0
  • Over 2.50 of 110%± 0
  • Over 3.50 of 110%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 9 of 11.

Shooting profile

2 shots

Where they shoot

2 shots
Every shotBy zone
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Nathan Wood, 2024/25, 2 shots in the final 35m, 0 scored.

left
0%
Centre
0%
right
100%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.147
Shots per 90
0.23
Key passes per 90
0.12
Average shot distance
8.4m
From set pieces
100%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
0%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
0%

Club role

Southampton

What they are for

  • On the pitch23% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Nathan Wood’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Joe Ayodele-Aribo0.3 xG1 shot, 0g
  2. Mateus Fernandes0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Tyler Dibling0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Season record

2024/25

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Nathan Wood carries 2.9% of Southampton’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.271
    49% of defenders
  • Possession value per 900.274
    34% of defenders

Ranked against 123 defenders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

11 appearances, oldest first

v Spurs1 shot
0 on target

v West Ham1 shot
0 on target

9 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 9 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.