-0.48goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.2312% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ build-up value
league 0.28
Max Kilman ranks 282nd of 402 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 10.4m on average, with 99% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 3% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ attacking involvement, the 9th largest share in the squad.
Against their position
135 defenders
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.0555th
Non-penalty goals
0.0555th
xG
0.0763rd
Non-penalty xG
0.0763rd
Shots
0.3731st
npxG per shot
0.1995th
Shot distance
10.4m89th
Set-piece share
99%93rd
Goals against xG
-0.624th
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.0023rd
Expected assists
0.0336th
Key passes
0.4556th
npxG + xA
0.1046th
xG chain
0.2531st
xG build-up
0.2344th
Assists against xA
-1.16th
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Defending
per 90
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
7season count
Red cards
0season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Ranked against 135 defenders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.
This week
Next match
Shots
38 appearances
Over 0.513 of 3834%± 8
Over 1.51 of 383%± 3
Over 2.50 of 380%± 0
Over 3.50 of 380%± 0
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 25 of 38.
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals
Max Kilman, 2023/24, 14 shots in the final 35m, 2 scored.
left
5%
Centre
94%
right
1%
share of their shooting xG
Chance profile
quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.186
Shots per 90
0.37
Key passes per 90
0.45
Average shot distance
10.4m
From set pieces
99%
How the chances arrive
Crosses
0%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
0%
Club role
Wolverhampton Wanderers
What they are for
On the pitch100% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Max Kilman’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Craig Dawson0.9 xG1 shot, 1g
Pedro Neto0.1 xG3 shots, 0g
Pablo Sarabia0.0 xG3 shots, 0g
João Gomes0.0 xG2 shots, 0g
Matheus Nunes0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Rayan Ait Nouri0.4 xG3 shots, 0g
Fabio Silva0.3 xG1 shot, 0g
Leon Chiwome0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Toti0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Matheus Cunha0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Season record
2023/24
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Max Kilman carries 12.3%of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ build-up value.
Build-up per 900.234
44% of defenders
Possession value per 900.246
31% of defenders
Ranked against 135 defenders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
38 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
at Man Utd1 shot 1 on target
v Liverpool1 shot 0 on target
at Luton1 shot 1 on target
at Fulham1 shot 1 on target
1g
v Everton1 shot 1 on target
1g
v Man Utd2 shots 1 on target
v Brentford1 shot 0 on target
at Newcastle1 shot 0 on target
v Fulham1 shot 0 on target
at Villa1 shot 0 on target
at Burnley1 shot 0 on target
at Forest1 shot 0 on target
v Palace1 shot 0 on target
25 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 25 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.
