Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Max Kilman

Defender
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.072 non-penalty goals from 14 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.030 assists, 17 key passes
Finishing
-0.48goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.2312% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ build-up value

Max Kilman ranks 282nd of 402 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 10.4m on average, with 99% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 3% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ attacking involvement, the 9th largest share in the squad.

Against their position

135 defenders

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.05
Non-penalty goals
0.05
xG
0.07
Non-penalty xG
0.07
Shots
0.37
npxG per shot
0.19
Shot distance
10.4m
Set-piece share
99%
Goals against xG
-0.6

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.00
Expected assists
0.03
Key passes
0.45
npxG + xA
0.10
xG chain
0.25
xG build-up
0.23
Assists against xA
-1.1

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
7season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Ranked against 135 defenders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Next match

Shots

38 appearances
  • Over 0.513 of 3834%± 8
  • Over 1.51 of 383%± 3
  • Over 2.50 of 380%± 0
  • Over 3.50 of 380%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 25 of 38.

Shooting profile

14 shots

Where they shoot

14 shots
14% of shots, 2 shots29% of shots, 4 shots21% of shots, 3 shots7% of shots, 1 shot7% of shots, 1 shot14% of shots, 2 shots7% of shots, 1 shot14%29%21%7%7%14%7%Opponent goalLeftRight
Share of shots<1%1–2%2–4%4–6%6%+

Max Kilman, 2023/24, final 35m.

left
5%
Centre
94%
right
1%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.186
Shots per 90
0.37
Key passes per 90
0.45
Average shot distance
10.4m
From set pieces
99%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
0%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
0%

Club role

Wolverhampton Wanderers

What they are for

  • On the pitch100% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Max Kilman’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Craig Dawson0.9 xG1 shot, 1g
  2. Pedro Neto0.1 xG3 shots, 0g
  3. Pablo Sarabia0.0 xG3 shots, 0g
  4. João Gomes0.0 xG2 shots, 0g
  5. Matheus Nunes0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Rayan Ait Nouri0.4 xG3 shots, 0g
  2. Fabio Silva0.3 xG1 shot, 0g
  3. Leon Chiwome0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Toti0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
  5. Matheus Cunha0.1 xG2 shots, 0g

Season record

2023/24

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Max Kilman carries 12.3% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.234
    44% of defenders
  • Possession value per 900.246
    31% of defenders

Ranked against 135 defenders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

38 appearances, oldest first

at Man Utd1 shot
1 on target

v Liverpool1 shot
0 on target

at Luton1 shot
1 on target

at Fulham1 shot
1 on target

1g

v Everton1 shot
1 on target

1g

v Man Utd2 shots
1 on target

v Brentford1 shot
0 on target

at Newcastle1 shot
0 on target

v Fulham1 shot
0 on target

at Villa1 shot
0 on target

at Burnley1 shot
0 on target

at Forest1 shot
0 on target

v Palace1 shot
0 on target

25 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 25 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.