Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Mathis Cherki

Midfielder23 yrs
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.234 non-penalty goals from 55 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.5412 assists, 60 key passes
Finishing
-0.10goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.565% of Manchester City’s build-up value

Mathis Cherki ranks 5th of 398 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 18.2m on average. They carry 10% of Manchester City’s attacking involvement, the 2nd largest share in the squad.

Against their position

109 forwards

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.20
Non-penalty goals
0.20
xG
0.23
Non-penalty xG
0.23
Shots
2.76
npxG per shot
0.08
Shot distance
18.2m
Set-piece share
11%
Goals against xG
-0.6

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.60
Expected assists
0.54
Key passes
3.01
npxG + xA
0.77
xG chain
1.05
xG build-up
0.56
Assists against xA
+1.2

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Defending

per 90
Recoveries
4.72
Defensive contribution
6.86

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
1season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Ranked against 109 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end. Recoveries and defensive contribution come from the FPL feed and are ranked in its own positions.

This week

Gameweek 8

Next fixture

Gameweek 8

away to Aston Villa

Sat 24 Oct, 11:30 UTC

Aston Villa concede 13.0 shots a match and are 0.91× the league norm against forwards. Roughly an average matchup.

Projected shots
2.68

2.76 per 90 × 0.97

Projected on target
0.68

0.65 per 90 × 1.05

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

33 appearances
  • Over 0.523 of 3370%± 8
  • Over 1.516 of 3348%± 9
  • Over 2.58 of 3324%± 7
  • Over 3.54 of 3312%± 6

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 10 of 33.

Shooting profile

55 shots

Where they shoot

55 shots
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Mathis Cherki, 2025/26, 55 shots in the final 35m, 4 scored.

left
15%
Centre
34%
right
50%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.084
Shots per 90
2.76
Key passes per 90
3.01
Average shot distance
18.2m
From set pieces
11%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
0%
Through balls
2%
Own dribble
20%
Headed
0%

Club role

Manchester City

What they are for

  • Corners and set piecesSupplies 13% of Manchester City’s dead-ball danger, from 15 deliveries that became shots.
  • When it mattered3 of 4 goals came with the game level or Manchester City behind.
  • On the pitch52% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Mathis Cherki’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Jéremy Doku0.9 xG10 shots, 0g
  2. Bernardo Silva0.6 xG9 shots, 0g
  3. Antoine Semenyo0.6 xG3 shots, 0g
  4. Matheus Nunes0.5 xG3 shots, 1g
  5. Erling Haaland0.2 xG3 shots, 1g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Erling Haaland4.0 xG18 shots, 2g
  2. Phil Foden1.4 xG6 shots, 3g
  3. Nico O'Reilly1.3 xG5 shots, 1g
  4. Sávio1.1 xG3 shots, 1g
  5. Antoine Semenyo1.0 xG6 shots, 1g

Season record

2025/26

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Mathis Cherki carries 5.4% of Manchester City’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.560
    99% of forwards
  • Possession value per 901.045
    98% of forwards

Ranked against 109 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

33 appearances, oldest first
1g

at Wolves1 shot
1 on target

v Everton1 shot
0 on target

at Villa1 shot
0 on target

v Bournemouth3 shots
1 on target

v Liverpool2 shots
0 on target

at Newcastle2 shots
1 on target

v Sunderland2 shots
1 on target

1g

at Forest4 shots
2 on target

v Chelsea2 shots
0 on target

v Brighton4 shots
0 on target

v Wolves2 shots
0 on target

1g

at Spurs3 shots
1 on target

at Liverpool1 shot
0 on target

at Leeds1 shot
0 on target

v Forest2 shots
0 on target

at West Ham2 shots
1 on target

at Chelsea2 shots
1 on target

1g

v Arsenal3 shots
1 on target

at Burnley8 shots
2 on target

at Everton4 shots
1 on target

v Brentford3 shots
0 on target

at Bournemouth1 shot
0 on target

v Villa1 shot
0 on target

10 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 10 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.