Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Wolverhampton Wanderers

Mario Lemina

Midfielder
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.144 non-penalty goals from 48 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.051 assists, 20 key passes
Finishing
-0.40goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.188% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ build-up value

Mario Lemina ranks 190th of 402 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 16.5m on average, with 54% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 9% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ attacking involvement, the 5th largest share in the squad.

Against their position

128 midfielders

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.12
Non-penalty goals
0.12
xG
0.14
Non-penalty xG
0.14
Shots
1.44
npxG per shot
0.10
Shot distance
16.5m
Set-piece share
54%
Goals against xG
-0.6

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.03
Expected assists
0.05
Key passes
0.60
npxG + xA
0.19
xG chain
0.27
xG build-up
0.18
Assists against xA
-0.8

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
10season count
Red cards
1season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Ranked against 128 midfielders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Next match

Shots

35 appearances
  • Over 0.527 of 3577%± 7
  • Over 1.514 of 3540%± 8
  • Over 2.56 of 3517%± 6
  • Over 3.51 of 353%± 3

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 8 of 35.

Shooting profile

48 shots

Where they shoot

48 shots
Every shotBy zone
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Mario Lemina, 2023/24, 48 shots in the final 35m, 4 scored.

left
16%
Centre
61%
right
24%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.096
Shots per 90
1.44
Key passes per 90
0.60
Average shot distance
16.5m
From set pieces
54%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
2%
Through balls
33%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
17%

Club role

Wolverhampton Wanderers

What they are for

  • When it mattered4 of 4 goals came with the game level or Wolverhampton Wanderers behind.
  • On the pitch88% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Mario Lemina’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Pablo Sarabia2.8 xG13 shots, 3g
  2. Rayan Ait Nouri0.5 xG5 shots, 0g
  3. Pedro Neto0.2 xG5 shots, 1g
  4. Matheus Cunha0.2 xG4 shots, 0g
  5. Craig Dawson0.1 xG3 shots, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Toti0.5 xG2 shots, 1g
  2. Hee-Chan Hwang0.4 xG2 shots, 0g
  3. Nathan Fraser0.4 xG2 shots, 0g
  4. Nélson Semedo0.1 xG3 shots, 0g
  5. Rayan Ait Nouri0.1 xG2 shots, 0g

Season record

2023/24

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Mario Lemina carries 8.4% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.181
    19% of midfielders
  • Possession value per 900.269
    18% of midfielders

Ranked against 128 midfielders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

35 appearances, oldest first

at Man Utd3 shots
0 on target

v Brighton2 shots
0 on target

at Everton3 shots
0 on target

v Liverpool1 shot
0 on target

at Luton1 shot
1 on target

v Villa1 shot
1 on target

1g

v Newcastle1 shot
1 on target

at Sheffield Utd2 shots
1 on target

1g

v Spurs3 shots
2 on target

at Fulham2 shots
1 on target

v Burnley1 shot
0 on target

at West Ham2 shots
1 on target

1g

v Chelsea3 shots
2 on target

1g

at Brentford1 shot
1 on target

at Brighton1 shot
1 on target

v Man Utd1 shot
0 on target

v Brentford4 shots
0 on target

at Spurs1 shot
1 on target

v Sheffield Utd2 shots
0 on target

v Fulham1 shot
0 on target

at Villa3 shots
1 on target

at Burnley1 shot
0 on target

v West Ham1 shot
1 on target

v Arsenal1 shot
1 on target

v Bournemouth2 shots
1 on target

v Luton2 shots
0 on target

v Palace2 shots
1 on target

8 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 8 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.