-1.62goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.546% of Chelsea’s build-up value
league 0.28
Malo Gusto ranks 107th of 402 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 18.9m on average. They carry 4% of Chelsea’s attacking involvement, the 8th largest share in the squad.
75% chance. Illness - 75% chance of playing. Weigh the rates below against the chance he features at all. Club status as of 17 Oct 2026.
Against their position
135 defenders
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.0020th
Non-penalty goals
0.0020th
xG
0.0973rd
Non-penalty xG
0.0973rd
Shots
0.7780th
npxG per shot
0.1159th
Shot distance
18.9m31st
Set-piece share
7%7th
Goals against xG
-1.76th
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.3197th
Expected assists
0.2897th
Key passes
1.6494th
npxG + xA
0.3798th
xG chain
0.7297th
xG build-up
0.5491st
Assists against xA
+0.577th
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Defending
per 90
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
7season count
Red cards
1season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Ranked against 135 defenders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.
This week
Gameweek 8
Next fixture
Gameweek 8
vsTottenham
Sat 24 Oct, 16:30 UTC
Tottenham concede 12.9 shots a match and are 1.08× the league norm against defenders. Roughly an average matchup.
Projected shots
0.78
0.77 per 90 × 1.01
Projected on target
0.24
0.26 per 90 × 0.92
Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.
Shots
27 appearances
Over 0.512 of 2744%± 10
Over 1.52 of 277%± 5
Over 2.51 of 274%± 4
Over 3.50 of 270%± 0
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 15 of 27.
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals
Malo Gusto, 2023/24, 15 shots in the final 35m, 0 scored.
left
2%
Centre
5%
right
93%
share of their shooting xG
Chance profile
quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.113
Shots per 90
0.77
Key passes per 90
1.64
Average shot distance
18.9m
From set pieces
7%
How the chances arrive
Crosses
0%
Through balls
6%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
0%
Club role
Chelsea
What they are for
On the pitch51% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Malo Gusto’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Raheem Sterling0.5 xG2 shots, 0g
Nicolas Jackson0.3 xG1 shot, 0g
Enzo Fernández0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Cole Palmer0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Chimuanya Ugochukwu0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Nicolas Jackson1.4 xG3 shots, 1g
Raheem Sterling1.0 xG3 shots, 2g
Mykhailo Mudryk1.0 xG3 shots, 1g
Cole Palmer0.7 xG14 shots, 0g
Christopher Nkunku0.4 xG1 shot, 1g
Season record
2023/24
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Malo Gusto carries 5.8%of Chelsea’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.543
90% of defenders
Possession value per 900.721
96% of defenders
Ranked against 135 defenders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
27 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
at West Ham1 shot 0 on target
v Luton1 shot 0 on target
at Bournemouth1 shot 0 on target
v Arsenal1 shot 0 on target
v Man City1 shot 0 on target
at Wolves1 shot 0 on target
v Fulham1 shot 0 on target
at Liverpool1 shot 1 on target
v Burnley3 shots 1 on target
at Forest1 shot 1 on target
at Brighton2 shots 1 on target
v Bournemouth1 shot 1 on target
15 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 15 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.