+0.47goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.298% of Manchester United’s build-up value
league 0.24
Luke Shaw ranks 333rd of 398 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 16.8m on average, with 49% of their danger coming from set pieces.
75% chance. Unspecified injury - 75% chance of playing. Weigh the rates below against the chance he features at all. Club status as of 17 Oct 2026.
Against their position
119 defenders
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.0353rd
Non-penalty goals
0.0354th
xG
0.0217th
Non-penalty xG
0.0218th
Shots
0.2819th
npxG per shot
0.0627th
Shot distance
16.8m40th
Set-piece share
49%29th
Goals against xG
+0.487th
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.0351st
Expected assists
0.0453rd
Key passes
0.4159th
npxG + xA
0.0626th
xG chain
0.3263rd
xG build-up
0.2971st
Assists against xA
-0.529th
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Defending
per 90
Recoveries
2.9317th
Defensive contribution
6.2625th
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
9season count
Red cards
0season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Ranked against 119 defenders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end. Recoveries and defensive contribution come from the FPL feed and are ranked in its own positions.
This week
Gameweek 7
Next fixture
Gameweek 7
away toLeeds
Sun 18 Oct, 13:00 UTC
Leeds concede 12.6 shots a match and are 1.00× the league norm against defenders. Roughly an average matchup.
Projected shots
0.28
0.28 per 90 × 1.00
Projected on target
0.06
0.06 per 90 × 1.00
Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.
Shots
38 appearances
Over 0.58 of 3821%± 7
Over 1.52 of 385%± 4
Over 2.50 of 380%± 0
Over 3.50 of 380%± 0
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 30 of 38.
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals
Luke Shaw, 2025/26, 10 shots in the final 35m, 1 scored.
left
46%
Centre
54%
right
0%
share of their shooting xG
Chance profile
quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.060
Shots per 90
0.28
Key passes per 90
0.41
Average shot distance
16.8m
From set pieces
49%
How the chances arrive
Crosses
0%
Through balls
24%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
0%
Club role
Manchester United
What they are for
On the pitch96% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Luke Shaw’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Bruno Fernandes0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Benjamin Sesko0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Kobbie Mainoo0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
Casemiro0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Benjamin Sesko0.6 xG4 shots, 0g
Joshua Zirkzee0.5 xG2 shots, 0g
Amad Diallo Traore0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Bruno Fernandes0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Mason Mount0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Season record
2025/26
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Luke Shaw carries 8.3%of Manchester United’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.292
71% of defenders
Possession value per 900.315
63% of defenders
Ranked against 119 defenders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
38 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
v Chelsea1 shot 0 on target
v Spurs2 shots 1 on target
at West Ham1 shot 0 on target
at Everton1 shot 0 on target
v Leeds1 shot 0 on target
v Brentford2 shots 0 on target
1g
v Forest1 shot 1 on target
at Brighton1 shot 0 on target
30 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 30 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.