Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Burnley

Luca Koleosho

Forward
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.211 non-penalty goals from 23 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.131 assists, 11 key passes
Finishing
-1.22goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.020% of Burnley’s build-up value

Luca Koleosho ranks 119th of 402 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 19.6m on average. They carry 4% of Burnley’s attacking involvement, the 12th largest share in the squad.

Against their position

107 forwards

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.09
Non-penalty goals
0.09
xG
0.21
Non-penalty xG
0.21
Shots
2.04
npxG per shot
0.10
Shot distance
19.6m
Set-piece share
7%
Goals against xG
-1.3

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.09
Expected assists
0.13
Key passes
0.98
npxG + xA
0.34
xG chain
0.33
xG build-up
0.02
Assists against xA
-0.5

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
0season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Ranked against 107 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Next match

Shots

15 appearances
  • Over 0.512 of 1580%± 10
  • Over 1.57 of 1547%± 13
  • Over 2.53 of 1520%± 10
  • Over 3.51 of 157%± 6

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 3 of 15.

Shooting profile

23 shots

Where they shoot

23 shots
Every shotBy zone
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Luca Koleosho, 2023/24, 23 shots in the final 35m, 1 scored.

left
68%
Centre
6%
right
27%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.101
Shots per 90
2.04
Key passes per 90
0.98
Average shot distance
19.6m
From set pieces
7%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
3%
Through balls
13%
Own dribble
9%
Headed
3%

Club role

Burnley

What they are for

  • On the pitch30% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Luca Koleosho’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Lyle Foster0.5 xG1 shot, 0g
  2. Charlie Taylor0.3 xG2 shots, 0g
  3. Zeki Amdouni0.2 xG2 shots, 1g
  4. Josh Brownhill0.2 xG6 shots, 0g
  5. Josh Cullen0.1 xG2 shots, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Zeki Amdouni0.6 xG6 shots, 0g
  2. Lyle Foster0.6 xG2 shots, 1g
  3. Johann Berg Gudmundsson0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Jacob Bruun Larsen0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  5. Wilson Odobert0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Season record

2023/24

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Luca Koleosho carries 0.4% of Burnley’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.025
    2% of forwards
  • Possession value per 900.331
    5% of forwards

Ranked against 107 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

15 appearances, oldest first

v Man City1 shot
0 on target

v Villa2 shots
0 on target

v Spurs2 shots
0 on target

v Man Utd2 shots
0 on target

at Luton3 shots
1 on target

v Chelsea1 shot
1 on target

at Brentford2 shots
0 on target

v Palace4 shots
1 on target

at Arsenal1 shot
0 on target

v West Ham1 shot
1 on target

1g

v Sheffield Utd3 shots
1 on target

at Wolves1 shot
0 on target

3 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 3 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.