Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Bournemouth

Lewis Cook

Midfielder29 yrs
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.010 non-penalty goals from 3 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.041 assists, 11 key passes
Finishing
-0.05goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.262% of Bournemouth’s build-up value

Lewis Cook ranks 348th of 398 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 26.8m on average, with 77% of their danger coming from set pieces.

Against their position

142 midfielders

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.00
Non-penalty goals
0.00
xG
0.01
Non-penalty xG
0.01
Shots
0.32
npxG per shot
–not ranked
Shot distance
–not ranked
Set-piece share
–not ranked
Goals against xG
-0.1

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.11
Expected assists
0.04
Key passes
1.18
npxG + xA
0.04
xG chain
0.27
xG build-up
0.26
Assists against xA
+0.7

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Defending

per 90
Recoveries
6.40
Defensive contribution
14.76

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
1season count
Red cards
1season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Ranked against 142 midfielders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end. Recoveries and defensive contribution come from the FPL feed and are ranked in its own positions.

This week

Gameweek 7

Next fixture

Gameweek 7

vs Sunderland

Sun 18 Oct, 13:00 UTC

Sunderland concede 14.3 shots a match and are 1.26× the league norm against midfielders. A favourable draw.

Projected shots
0.39

0.32 per 90 × 1.20

Projected on target
0.00

0.00 per 90 × 1.07

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

17 appearances
  • Over 0.53 of 1718%± 9
  • Over 1.50 of 170%± 0
  • Over 2.50 of 170%± 0
  • Over 3.50 of 170%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 14 of 17.

Shooting profile

3 shots

Where they shoot

3 shots
Every shotBy zone
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Lewis Cook, 2025/26, 3 shots in the final 35m, 0 scored.

left
0%
Centre
77%
right
23%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.020
Shots per 90
0.32
Key passes per 90
1.18
Average shot distance
26.8m
From set pieces
77%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
0%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
0%

Club role

Bournemouth

What they are for

  • On the pitch25% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Lewis Cook’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Adrien Truffert0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Marcos Senesi0.2 xG2 shots, 0g
  2. Evanilson0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
  3. Antoine Semenyo0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Marcus Tavernier0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
  5. Eli Junior Kroupi0.0 xG1 shot, 1g

Season record

2025/26

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Lewis Cook carries 2.5% of Bournemouth’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.255
    42% of midfielders
  • Possession value per 900.272
    21% of midfielders

Ranked against 142 midfielders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

17 appearances, oldest first

at Villa1 shot
0 on target

v West Ham1 shot
0 on target

at Brentford1 shot
0 on target

14 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 14 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.