-2.35goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.183% of Fulham’s build-up value
league 0.24
Joshua King ranks 108th of 398 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 17.1m on average, with 26% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 6% of Fulham’s attacking involvement, the 10th largest share in the squad.
Against their position
109 forwards
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.079th
Non-penalty goals
0.0711th
xG
0.2644th
Non-penalty xG
0.2647th
Shots
1.7932nd
npxG per shot
0.1562nd
Shot distance
17.1m39th
Set-piece share
26%65th
Goals against xG
-2.815th
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.1467th
Expected assists
0.0722nd
Key passes
1.0350th
npxG + xA
0.3328th
xG chain
0.4333rd
xG build-up
0.1856th
Assists against xA
+1.089th
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Defending
per 90
Recoveries
4.1239th
Defensive contribution
7.4740th
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
4season count
Red cards
0season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Ranked against 109 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end. Recoveries and defensive contribution come from the FPL feed and are ranked in its own positions.
This week
Gameweek 8
Next fixture
Gameweek 8
away toCoventry
Sat 24 Oct, 14:00 UTC
No shot record for Coventry in this season, so no opponent adjustment is possible. Newly promoted sides have no Premier League history to measure.
Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.
Shots
32 appearances
Over 0.517 of 3253%± 9
Over 1.57 of 3222%± 7
Over 2.52 of 326%± 4
Over 3.50 of 320%± 0
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 15 of 32.
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals
Joshua King, 2025/26, 25 shots in the final 35m, 1 scored.
left
34%
Centre
40%
right
26%
share of their shooting xG
Chance profile
quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.146
Shots per 90
1.79
Key passes per 90
1.03
Average shot distance
17.1m
From set pieces
26%
How the chances arrive
Crosses
2%
Through balls
11%
Own dribble
22%
Headed
3%
Club role
Fulham
What they are for
On the pitch38% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Joshua King’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Harry Wilson0.9 xG4 shots, 0g
Kevin0.5 xG2 shots, 0g
Rodrigo Muniz0.4 xG2 shots, 0g
Ryan Sessegnon0.3 xG1 shot, 0g
Alex Iwobi0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Harry Wilson0.5 xG7 shots, 2g
Rodrigo Muniz0.2 xG2 shots, 0g
Oscar Bobb0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Timothy Castagne0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Alex Iwobi0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Season record
2025/26
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Joshua King carries 3.0%of Fulham’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.179
55% of forwards
Possession value per 900.426
32% of forwards
Ranked against 109 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
32 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
at Brighton1 shot 1 on target
v Man Utd2 shots 1 on target
at Chelsea1 shot 1 on target
v Brentford2 shots 0 on target
at Villa3 shots 2 on target
at Bournemouth1 shot 0 on target
v Arsenal1 shot 0 on target
v Wolves1 shot 0 on target
v Sunderland2 shots 0 on target
v Man City1 shot 0 on target
at West Ham1 shot 0 on target
at Man City2 shots 1 on target
v West Ham2 shots 1 on target
at Forest1 shot 0 on target
1g
v Burnley3 shots 2 on target
v Bournemouth1 shot 0 on target
v Newcastle1 shot 1 on target
15 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 15 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.
