Jørgen Strand Larsen

Forward26 yrs

Non-penalty xG per 90: 0.4014 non-penalty goals from 54 shots
Expected assists per 90: 0.124 assists, 19 key passes
Finishing: +3.46goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90: 0.124% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ build-up value

Jørgen Strand Larsen ranks 55th of 397 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 11.5m on average. They carry 15% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ attacking involvement, the 2nd largest share in the squad.

Against their position

104 forwards

Shooting

per 90

Goals: 0.48
Non-penalty goals: 0.48
xG: 0.40
Non-penalty xG: 0.40
Shots: 1.85
npxG per shot: 0.22
Shot distance: 11.5m
Set-piece share: 11%
Goals against xG: +2.3

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Creating

per 90

Assists: 0.14
Expected assists: 0.12
Key passes: 0.65
npxG + xA: 0.52
xG chain: 0.57
xG build-up: 0.12
Assists against xA: +0.6

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Discipline

per 90

Yellow cards: 4season count
Red cards: 0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Ranked against 104 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Gameweek 7

Next fixture

Gameweek 7

away to Brighton

Sun 18 Oct, 13:00 UTC

Brighton concede 11.3 shots a match and are 1.00× the league norm against forwards. Roughly an average matchup.

Projected shots: 1.73
Projected on target: 0.99

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

35 appearances

Over 0.528 of 3580%± 7
Over 1.516 of 3546%± 8
Over 2.56 of 3517%± 6
Over 3.53 of 359%± 5

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 7 of 35.

Shooting profile

54 shots

Where they shoot

54 shots

Every shot By zone

Opponent goalLeftRight

GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Jørgen Strand Larsen, 2024/25, 54 shots in the final 35m, 14 scored.

left: 6%
Centre: 69%
right: 25%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route

xG per shot: 0.216
Shots per 90: 1.85
Key passes per 90: 0.65
Average shot distance: 11.5m
From set pieces: 11%

How the chances arrive

Crosses: 24%
Through balls: 6%
Own dribble: 0%
Headed: 18%

Club role

Wolverhampton Wanderers

What they are for

Corners and set piecesSupplies 7% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ dead-ball danger, from 3 deliveries that became shots.
When it mattered11 of 14 goals came with the game level or Wolverhampton Wanderers behind.
On the pitch77% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Jørgen Strand Larsen’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them

Rayan Ait Nouri1.5 xG6 shots, 3g
Jean-Ricner Bellegarde1.4 xG8 shots, 4g
Matheus Cunha1.3 xG12 shots, 2g
Pablo Sarabia1.0 xG3 shots, 1g
Marshall Munetsi0.9 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply

Marshall Munetsi0.9 xG4 shots, 1g
Matheus Cunha0.8 xG4 shots, 0g
Mario Lemina0.6 xG1 shot, 1g
Emmanuel Agbadou0.4 xG1 shot, 1g
Gonçalo Guedes0.4 xG2 shots, 1g

Season record

2024/25

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Jørgen Strand Larsen carries 3.9% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ build-up value.

Build-up per 900.118
17% of forwards
Possession value per 900.568
40% of forwards

Ranked against 104 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

35 appearances, oldest first

at Arsenal1 shot
1 on target

v Chelsea2 shots
1 on target

v Newcastle2 shots
1 on target

at Villa2 shots
1 on target

v Liverpool1 shot
0 on target

at Brentford1 shot
1 on target

v Man City1 shot
1 on target

at Brighton2 shots
2 on target

v Palace2 shots
2 on target

v Southampton1 shot
1 on target

at Fulham1 shot
0 on target

v Bournemouth3 shots
2 on target

at Everton2 shots
1 on target

v Ipswich5 shots
2 on target

v Man Utd1 shot
1 on target

at Spurs1 shot
1 on target

v Forest3 shots
2 on target

at Newcastle2 shots
1 on target

at Chelsea2 shots
2 on target

at Bournemouth1 shot
0 on target

v Everton1 shot
1 on target

at Southampton2 shots
2 on target

v West Ham2 shots
1 on target

at Ipswich3 shots
2 on target

v Spurs4 shots
2 on target

at Man Utd1 shot
0 on target

v Leicester4 shots
1 on target

at Palace1 shot
1 on target

7 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 7 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.

Search

Jørgen Strand Larsen

Match by match