Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Crystal Palace

Jørgen Strand Larsen

Forward26 yrs
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.193 non-penalty goals from 44 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.031 assists, 10 key passes
Finishing
-1.41goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.103% of Crystal Palace’s build-up value

Jørgen Strand Larsen ranks 175th of 398 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 15.5m on average, with 37% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 6% of Crystal Palace’s attacking involvement, the 8th largest share in the squad.

Against their position

109 forwards

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.15
Non-penalty goals
0.11
xG
0.25
Non-penalty xG
0.19
Shots
1.68
npxG per shot
0.11
Shot distance
15.5m
Set-piece share
37%
Goals against xG
-2.0

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.04
Expected assists
0.03
Key passes
0.38
npxG + xA
0.22
xG chain
0.27
xG build-up
0.10
Assists against xA
+0.3

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Defending

per 90
Recoveries
1.45
Defensive contribution
3.72

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
4season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Ranked against 109 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end. Recoveries and defensive contribution come from the FPL feed and are ranked in its own positions.

This week

Gameweek 7

Next fixture

Gameweek 7

away to Brighton

Sun 18 Oct, 13:00 UTC

Brighton concede 11.7 shots a match and are 1.06× the league norm against forwards. Roughly an average matchup.

Projected shots
1.68

1.68 per 90 × 1.00

Projected on target
0.50

0.54 per 90 × 0.92

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

36 appearances
  • Over 0.528 of 3678%± 7
  • Over 1.511 of 3631%± 8
  • Over 2.54 of 3611%± 5
  • Over 3.51 of 363%± 3

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 8 of 36.

Shooting profile

44 shots

Where they shoot

44 shots
Every shotBy zone
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Jørgen Strand Larsen, 2025/26, 43 shots in the final 35m, 4 scored.

left
14%
Centre
50%
right
36%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.148
Shots per 90
1.68
Key passes per 90
0.38
Average shot distance
15.5m
From set pieces
37%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
25%
Through balls
20%
Own dribble
4%
Headed
18%

Club role

Crystal Palace

What they are for

  • When it mattered2 of 3 goals came with the game level or Crystal Palace behind.
  • On the pitch69% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Jørgen Strand Larsen’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Adam Wharton1.3 xG5 shots, 2g
  2. Jefferson Lerma0.4 xG1 shot, 1g
  3. Jhon Arias0.4 xG3 shots, 0g
  4. Tyrick Mitchell0.4 xG4 shots, 0g
  5. Jackson Tchatchoua0.4 xG2 shots, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Mateus Mané0.3 xG2 shots, 1g
  2. Brennan Johnson0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  3. Tolu Arokodare0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
  4. Santiago Bueno0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  5. Jean-Ricner Bellegarde0.1 xG1 shot, 0g

Season record

2025/26

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Jørgen Strand Larsen carries 2.8% of Crystal Palace’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.098
    21% of forwards
  • Possession value per 900.270
    6% of forwards

Ranked against 109 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

36 appearances, oldest first

v Man City4 shots
2 on target

at Bournemouth1 shot
1 on target

v Leeds1 shot
0 on target

at Spurs1 shot
0 on target

v Brighton1 shot
0 on target

at Sunderland1 shot
0 on target

1g

v Burnley2 shots
2 on target

at Chelsea1 shot
0 on target

v Palace1 shot
0 on target

at Villa1 shot
1 on target

at Arsenal1 shot
0 on target

v Brentford2 shots
1 on target

v West Ham2 shots
0 on target

v Newcastle1 shot
0 on target

v Bournemouth1 shot
0 on target

at Brighton3 shots
2 on target

2g

v Burnley3 shots
2 on target

v Wolves1 shot
0 on target

at Man Utd2 shots
0 on target

1g

at Spurs2 shots
1 on target

v Newcastle1 shot
0 on target

v West Ham2 shots
0 on target

at Liverpool1 shot
0 on target

at Bournemouth2 shots
1 on target

v Everton1 shot
0 on target

at Man City1 shot
0 on target

at Brentford3 shots
1 on target

v Arsenal1 shot
0 on target

8 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 8 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.