-1.46goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.2810% of Fulham’s build-up value
league 0.24
Joachim Andersen ranks 324th of 398 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 14.8m on average, with 85% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 2% of Fulham’s attacking involvement, the 15th largest share in the squad.
Against their position
119 defenders
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.0026th
Non-penalty goals
0.0026th
xG
0.0552nd
Non-penalty xG
0.0553rd
Shots
0.5053rd
npxG per shot
0.1048th
Shot distance
14.8m51st
Set-piece share
85%62nd
Goals against xG
-1.79th
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.0355th
Expected assists
0.0228th
Key passes
0.1919th
npxG + xA
0.0732nd
xG chain
0.2954th
xG build-up
0.2867th
Assists against xA
+0.477th
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Defending
per 90
Recoveries
3.5643rd
Defensive contribution
10.2787th
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
7season count
Red cards
1season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Ranked against 119 defenders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end. Recoveries and defensive contribution come from the FPL feed and are ranked in its own positions.
This week
Gameweek 8
Next fixture
Gameweek 8
away toCoventry
Sat 24 Oct, 14:00 UTC
No shot record for Coventry in this season, so no opponent adjustment is possible. Newly promoted sides have no Premier League history to measure.
Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.
Shots
33 appearances
Over 0.511 of 3333%± 8
Over 1.54 of 3312%± 6
Over 2.51 of 333%± 3
Over 3.50 of 330%± 0
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 22 of 33.
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals
Joachim Andersen, 2025/26, 16 shots in the final 35m, 0 scored.
left
10%
Centre
83%
right
7%
share of their shooting xG
Chance profile
quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.104
Shots per 90
0.50
Key passes per 90
0.19
Average shot distance
14.8m
From set pieces
85%
How the chances arrive
Crosses
25%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
0%
Club role
Fulham
What they are for
On the pitch84% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Joachim Andersen’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Jorge Cuenca0.4 xG1 shot, 0g
Harry Wilson0.3 xG5 shots, 0g
Sasa Lukic0.2 xG2 shots, 0g
Alex Iwobi0.2 xG2 shots, 0g
Timothy Castagne0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Samuel Chukwueze0.2 xG1 shot, 1g
Sander Berge0.2 xG2 shots, 0g
Timothy Castagne0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Oscar Bobb0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Calvin Bassey0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
Season record
2025/26
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Joachim Andersen carries 10.3%of Fulham’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.279
66% of defenders
Possession value per 900.289
54% of defenders
Ranked against 119 defenders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
33 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
at Chelsea2 shots 0 on target
v Brentford1 shot 0 on target
v Wolves1 shot 0 on target
v Sunderland2 shots 0 on target
at West Ham1 shot 1 on target
at Palace1 shot 0 on target
at Man Utd3 shots 1 on target
v Everton1 shot 0 on target
at Liverpool2 shots 1 on target
at Brentford1 shot 0 on target
v Bournemouth1 shot 0 on target
22 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 22 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.
