Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Wolverhampton Wanderers

Jhon Arias

Forward
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.261 non-penalty goals from 16 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.070 assists, 11 key passes
Finishing
-1.91goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.113% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ build-up value

Jhon Arias ranks 110th of 398 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 16.4m on average. They carry 7% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ attacking involvement, the 5th largest share in the squad.

Against their position

109 forwards

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.08
Non-penalty goals
0.08
xG
0.26
Non-penalty xG
0.26
Shots
1.26
npxG per shot
0.21
Shot distance
16.4m
Set-piece share
7%
Goals against xG
-2.3

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.00
Expected assists
0.07
Key passes
0.87
npxG + xA
0.33
xG chain
0.39
xG build-up
0.11
Assists against xA
-0.9

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
1season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Ranked against 109 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Next match

Shots

23 appearances
  • Over 0.512 of 2352%± 10
  • Over 1.54 of 2317%± 8
  • Over 2.50 of 230%± 0
  • Over 3.50 of 230%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 11 of 23.

Shooting profile

16 shots

Where they shoot

16 shots
Every shotBy zone
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Jhon Arias, 2025/26, 16 shots in the final 35m, 1 scored.

left
11%
Centre
65%
right
24%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.206
Shots per 90
1.26
Key passes per 90
0.87
Average shot distance
16.4m
From set pieces
7%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
28%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
24%

Club role

Wolverhampton Wanderers

What they are for

  • On the pitch33% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Jhon Arias’output.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Jackson Tchatchoua0.8 xG2 shots, 0g
  2. David Møller Wolfe0.7 xG2 shots, 0g
  3. Hee-Chan Hwang0.6 xG1 shot, 1g
  4. Hugo Bueno0.2 xG2 shots, 0g
  5. Yerson Mosquera0.1 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Jørgen Strand Larsen0.4 xG3 shots, 0g
  2. Hugo Bueno0.3 xG2 shots, 0g
  3. Marshall Munetsi0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Hee-Chan Hwang0.0 xG2 shots, 0g
  5. Rodrigo Gomes0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Season record

2025/26

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Jhon Arias carries 2.6% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.106
    29% of forwards
  • Possession value per 900.385
    24% of forwards

Ranked against 109 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

23 appearances, oldest first

at Bournemouth1 shot
0 on target

v Everton1 shot
1 on target

at Newcastle1 shot
0 on target

at Spurs2 shots
0 on target

v Brighton2 shots
1 on target

at Sunderland1 shot
0 on target

v Burnley2 shots
0 on target

v Palace1 shot
0 on target

at Villa2 shots
0 on target

v Forest1 shot
0 on target

at Man Utd1 shot
0 on target

1g

v West Ham1 shot
1 on target

11 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 11 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.