+0.15goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.188% of Leicester’s build-up value
league 0.27
James Justin ranks 282nd of 397 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 16.8m on average, with 64% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 3% of Leicester’s attacking involvement, the 11th largest share in the squad.
Against their position
123 defenders
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.0674th
Non-penalty goals
0.0674th
xG
0.0665th
Non-penalty xG
0.0665th
Shots
0.7779th
npxG per shot
0.0838th
Shot distance
16.8m40th
Set-piece share
64%45th
Goals against xG
-0.070th
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.0674th
Expected assists
0.0340th
Key passes
0.4660th
npxG + xA
0.0946th
xG chain
0.2114th
xG build-up
0.1813th
Assists against xA
+1.095th
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Defending
per 90
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
6season count
Red cards
0season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Ranked against 123 defenders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.
This week
Gameweek 7
Next fixture
Gameweek 7
vsManchester United
Sun 18 Oct, 13:00 UTC
Manchester United concede 10.9 shots a match and are 0.84× the league norm against defenders. A difficult one.
Projected shots
0.64
0.77 per 90 × 0.84
Projected on target
0.16
0.18 per 90 × 0.89
Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.
Shots
36 appearances
Over 0.515 of 3642%± 8
Over 1.58 of 3622%± 7
Over 2.52 of 366%± 4
Over 3.50 of 360%± 0
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 21 of 36.
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals
James Justin, 2024/25, 25 shots in the final 35m, 2 scored.
left
4%
Centre
55%
right
42%
share of their shooting xG
Chance profile
quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.082
Shots per 90
0.77
Key passes per 90
0.46
Average shot distance
16.8m
From set pieces
64%
How the chances arrive
Crosses
40%
Through balls
3%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
39%
Club role
Leicester
What they are for
On the pitch86% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of James Justin’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Jamie Vardy0.8 xG3 shots, 0g
Victor Kristiansen0.4 xG2 shots, 0g
Stephy Mavididi0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Jordan Ayew0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Facundo Buonanotte0.1 xG3 shots, 1g
Chances created
who they supply
Facundo Buonanotte0.4 xG2 shots, 1g
Jamie Vardy0.3 xG5 shots, 1g
Jordan Ayew0.1 xG3 shots, 0g
Bobby Reid0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
Stephy Mavididi0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
Season record
2024/25
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
James Justin carries 8.1%of Leicester’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.181
13% of defenders
Possession value per 900.212
14% of defenders
Ranked against 123 defenders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
36 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
v Spurs1 shot 0 on target
v Villa1 shot 0 on target
at Palace1 shot 0 on target
2g
at Arsenal3 shots 2 on target
at Southampton2 shots 0 on target
at Brentford1 shot 0 on target
v Brighton2 shots 1 on target
v Wolves1 shot 1 on target
at Liverpool2 shots 0 on target
v Man City3 shots 1 on target
v Palace2 shots 0 on target
at Spurs2 shots 1 on target
at Everton1 shot 0 on target
at West Ham2 shots 0 on target
at Forest1 shot 0 on target
21 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 21 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.
