-0.31goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.315% of Aston Villa’s build-up value
league 0.27
Jacob Ramsey ranks 167th of 397 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 17.5m on average. They carry 5% of Aston Villa’s attacking involvement, the 8th largest share in the squad.
Injured. Thigh injury - Unknown return date. The rates below describe what he did, not what he is about to do. Club status as of 17 Oct 2026.
Against their position
104 forwards
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.056th
Non-penalty goals
0.056th
xG
0.082nd
Non-penalty xG
0.082nd
Shots
1.034th
npxG per shot
0.088th
Shot distance
17.5m33rd
Set-piece share
9%26th
Goals against xG
-0.556th
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.1656th
Expected assists
0.1653rd
Key passes
1.1448th
npxG + xA
0.236th
xG chain
0.5030th
xG build-up
0.3183rd
Assists against xA
+0.163rd
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Defending
per 90
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
2season count
Red cards
1season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Ranked against 104 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.
This week
Gameweek 8
Next fixture
Gameweek 8
away toCrystal Palace
Sun 25 Oct, 14:00 UTC
Crystal Palace concede 12.8 shots a match and are 1.09× the league norm against forwards. Roughly an average matchup.
Projected shots
1.06
1.03 per 90 × 1.04
Projected on target
0.19
0.22 per 90 × 0.89
Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.
Shots
29 appearances
Over 0.515 of 2952%± 9
Over 1.54 of 2914%± 6
Over 2.50 of 290%± 0
Over 3.50 of 290%± 0
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 14 of 29.
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals
Jacob Ramsey, 2024/25, 19 shots in the final 35m, 1 scored.
left
48%
Centre
42%
right
10%
share of their shooting xG
Chance profile
quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.077
Shots per 90
1.03
Key passes per 90
1.14
Average shot distance
17.5m
From set pieces
9%
How the chances arrive
Crosses
0%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
21%
Headed
0%
Club role
Aston Villa
What they are for
On the pitch49% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Jacob Ramsey’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Youri Tielemans0.3 xG5 shots, 0g
Ollie Watkins0.2 xG2 shots, 1g
Tyrone Mings0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Amadou Onana0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Jhon Durán0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Morgan Rogers0.5 xG4 shots, 1g
Ollie Watkins0.5 xG2 shots, 1g
Jhon Durán0.5 xG3 shots, 1g
Emiliano Buendía0.5 xG1 shot, 0g
Marco Asensio0.5 xG2 shots, 0g
Season record
2024/25
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Jacob Ramsey carries 4.5%of Aston Villa’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.311
83% of forwards
Possession value per 900.498
30% of forwards
Ranked against 104 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
29 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
at West Ham1 shot 0 on target
v Arsenal1 shot 1 on target
at Leicester1 shot 1 on target
v Everton2 shots 0 on target
at Ipswich1 shot 0 on target
at Fulham1 shot 1 on target
at Spurs1 shot 0 on target
at Liverpool2 shots 0 on target
at Everton2 shots 0 on target
1g
v West Ham1 shot 1 on target
at Brentford2 shots 0 on target
at Southampton1 shot 0 on target
v Newcastle1 shot 0 on target
v Fulham1 shot 0 on target
at Bournemouth1 shot 0 on target
14 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 14 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.