+0.61goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.236% of Nottingham Forest’s build-up value
league 0.24
Ibrahim Sangare ranks 256th of 398 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 21.6m on average, with 27% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 5% of Nottingham Forest’s attacking involvement, the 8th largest share in the squad.
Against their position
142 midfielders
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.0954th
Non-penalty goals
0.0956th
xG
0.0738th
Non-penalty xG
0.0738th
Shots
0.6823rd
npxG per shot
0.1064th
Shot distance
21.6m24th
Set-piece share
27%62nd
Goals against xG
+0.476th
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.0943rd
Expected assists
0.0626th
Key passes
0.5117th
npxG + xA
0.1326th
xG chain
0.3231st
xG build-up
0.2335th
Assists against xA
+0.675th
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Defending
per 90
Recoveries
4.9572nd
Defensive contribution
11.5990th
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
5season count
Red cards
0season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Ranked against 142 midfielders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end. Recoveries and defensive contribution come from the FPL feed and are ranked in its own positions.
This week
Gameweek 7
Next fixture
Gameweek 7
vsArsenal
Sun 18 Oct, 15:30 UTC
Arsenal concede 8.3 shots a match and are 0.69× the league norm against midfielders. A difficult one.
Projected shots
0.46
0.68 per 90 × 0.67
Projected on target
0.12
0.21 per 90 × 0.57
Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.
Shots
28 appearances
Over 0.510 of 2836%± 9
Over 1.55 of 2818%± 7
Over 2.51 of 284%± 4
Over 3.50 of 280%± 0
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 18 of 28.
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals
Ibrahim Sangare, 2025/26, 16 shots in the final 35m, 2 scored.
left
26%
Centre
70%
right
3%
share of their shooting xG
Chance profile
quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.098
Shots per 90
0.68
Key passes per 90
0.51
Average shot distance
21.6m
From set pieces
27%
How the chances arrive
Crosses
27%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
27%
Club role
Nottingham Forest
What they are for
On the pitch62% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Ibrahim Sangare’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Nicolò Savona0.3 xG1 shot, 0g
Igor Jesus0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
Callum Hudson-Odoi0.0 xG1 shot, 1g
Morgan Gibbs-White0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
Neco Williams0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Callum Hudson-Odoi1.2 xG5 shots, 2g
Morgan Gibbs-White0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Igor Jesus0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Taiwo Awoniyi0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Neco Williams0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
Season record
2025/26
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Ibrahim Sangare carries 5.9%of Nottingham Forest’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.226
35% of midfielders
Possession value per 900.316
30% of midfielders
Ranked against 142 midfielders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
28 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
v Brentford1 shot 0 on target
at Palace1 shot 0 on target
v Chelsea2 shots 1 on target
1g
v Leeds2 shots 1 on target
v Brighton1 shot 0 on target
1g
v Spurs2 shots 1 on target
at Brentford1 shot 0 on target
at Leeds3 shots 1 on target
v Liverpool2 shots 0 on target
at Brighton1 shot 1 on target
18 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 18 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.
