Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Nottingham Forest

Ibrahim Sangare

Midfielder28 yrs
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.000 non-penalty goals from 1 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.111 assists, 5 key passes
Finishing
-0.01goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.363% of Nottingham Forest’s build-up value

Ibrahim Sangare ranks 252nd of 397 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 30.5m on average.

Against their position

137 midfielders

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.00
Non-penalty goals
0.00
xG
0.00
Non-penalty xG
0.00
Shots
0.15
npxG per shot
–not ranked
Shot distance
–not ranked
Set-piece share
–not ranked
Goals against xG
-0.0

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.15
Expected assists
0.11
Key passes
0.77
npxG + xA
0.11
xG chain
0.46
xG build-up
0.36
Assists against xA
+0.3

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
3season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Ranked against 137 midfielders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Gameweek 7

Next fixture

Gameweek 7

vs Arsenal

Sun 18 Oct, 15:30 UTC

Arsenal concede 9.6 shots a match and are 0.77× the league norm against midfielders. A difficult one.

Projected shots
0.12

0.15 per 90 × 0.75

Projected on target
0.11

0.15 per 90 × 0.71

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

13 appearances
  • Over 0.51 of 138%± 7
  • Over 1.50 of 130%± 0
  • Over 2.50 of 130%± 0
  • Over 3.50 of 130%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 12 of 13.

Shooting profile

1 shots

Where they shoot

1 shots
Every shotBy zone
100% of shots, 1 shot100%Opponent goalLeftRight
Share of shots<1%1–2%2–4%4–6%6%+

Ibrahim Sangare, 2024/25, final 35m.

left
0%
Centre
100%
right
0%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.016
Shots per 90
0.15
Key passes per 90
0.77
Average shot distance
30.5m
From set pieces
0%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
0%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
0%

Club role

Nottingham Forest

What they are for

  • On the pitch17% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Ibrahim Sangare’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Nikola Milenkovic0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Neco Williams0.7 xG2 shots, 1g
  2. Anthony Elanga0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
  3. Ola Aina0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Season record

2024/25

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Ibrahim Sangare carries 3.2% of Nottingham Forest’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.363
    77% of midfielders
  • Possession value per 900.463
    55% of midfielders

Ranked against 137 midfielders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

13 appearances, oldest first

at Southampton1 shot
1 on target

12 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 12 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.