Small sample. Only 440 minutes this season, so the rates below swing heavily on a handful of moments. Read them as description, not as form.
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.020 non-penalty goals from 2 shots
league 0.15
Expected assists per 90
0.010 assists, 1 key pass
league 0.11
Finishing
-0.07goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.101% of Burnley’s build-up value
league 0.28
Hjalmar Ekdal has not reached the 450-minute floor this season, so they are not ranked against the league yet. They shoot from 16.6m on average, with 100% of their danger coming from set pieces.
Against their position
135 defenders
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.0020th
Non-penalty goals
0.0020th
xG
0.0219th
Non-penalty xG
0.0219th
Shots
0.4140th
npxG per shot
–not ranked
Shot distance
–not ranked
Set-piece share
–not ranked
Goals against xG
-0.158th
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.0023rd
Expected assists
0.0113th
Key passes
0.2023rd
npxG + xA
0.025th
xG chain
0.113rd
xG build-up
0.109th
Assists against xA
-0.060th
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Defending
per 90
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
2season count
Red cards
0season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Ranked against 135 defenders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.
This week
Next match
Shots
8 appearances
Over 0.52 of 825%± 15
Over 1.50 of 80%± 0
Over 2.50 of 80%± 0
Over 3.50 of 80%± 0
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 6 of 8.
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals
Hjalmar Ekdal, 2023/24, 2 shots in the final 35m, 0 scored.
left
0%
Centre
61%
right
39%
share of their shooting xG
Chance profile
quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.038
Shots per 90
0.41
Key passes per 90
0.20
Average shot distance
16.6m
From set pieces
100%
How the chances arrive
Crosses
0%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
0%
Club role
Burnley
What they are for
On the pitch13% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Hjalmar Ekdal’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Johann Berg Gudmundsson0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Zeki Amdouni0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
Season record
2023/24
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Hjalmar Ekdal carries 0.7%of Burnley’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.104
9% of defenders
Possession value per 900.111
3% of defenders
Thin sample. Only 440 minutes, so this describes a cameo. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
8 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
v Luton1 shot 0 on target
at Man City1 shot 1 on target
6 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 6 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against. 440 minutes leaves every tie here broken.
