Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Hee-Chan Hwang

Forward
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.121 non-penalty goals from 19 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.122 assists, 15 key passes
Finishing
-0.68goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.113% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ build-up value

Hee-Chan Hwang ranks 162nd of 398 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 18.5m on average, with 41% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 6% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ attacking involvement, the 6th largest share in the squad.

Against their position

109 forwards

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.12
Non-penalty goals
0.06
xG
0.16
Non-penalty xG
0.12
Shots
1.16
npxG per shot
0.10
Shot distance
18.5m
Set-piece share
41%
Goals against xG
-0.9

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.12
Expected assists
0.12
Key passes
0.92
npxG + xA
0.23
xG chain
0.32
xG build-up
0.11
Assists against xA
+0.1

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
5season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Ranked against 109 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Next match

Shots

26 appearances
  • Over 0.516 of 2662%± 10
  • Over 1.53 of 2612%± 6
  • Over 2.50 of 260%± 0
  • Over 3.50 of 260%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 10 of 26.

Shooting profile

19 shots

Where they shoot

19 shots
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Hee-Chan Hwang, 2025/26, 19 shots in the final 35m, 2 scored.

left
20%
Centre
49%
right
32%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.140
Shots per 90
1.16
Key passes per 90
0.92
Average shot distance
18.5m
From set pieces
41%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
23%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
16%

Club role

Wolverhampton Wanderers

What they are for

  • PenaltiesTakes them: 1 of 5 Wolverhampton Wanderers were awarded.
  • On the pitch43% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Hee-Chan Hwang’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Yerson Mosquera0.5 xG2 shots, 0g
  2. Jean-Ricner Bellegarde0.3 xG1 shot, 0g
  3. Marshall Munetsi0.3 xG1 shot, 1g
  4. Ki-Jana Hoever0.2 xG1 shot, 0g
  5. Tolu Arokodare0.1 xG3 shots, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Jhon Arias0.6 xG1 shot, 1g
  2. Pedro Lima0.4 xG1 shot, 0g
  3. Adam Armstrong0.3 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Mateus Mané0.3 xG5 shots, 1g
  5. Marshall Munetsi0.2 xG1 shot, 0g

Season record

2025/26

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Hee-Chan Hwang carries 3.4% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.107
    30% of forwards
  • Possession value per 900.316
    14% of forwards

Ranked against 109 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

26 appearances, oldest first
1g

v Everton1 shot
1 on target

at Newcastle2 shots
1 on target

at Spurs1 shot
0 on target

v Brighton1 shot
0 on target

v Palace1 shot
0 on target

at Arsenal1 shot
1 on target

v Brentford1 shot
1 on target

at Liverpool1 shot
0 on target

at Man Utd2 shots
0 on target

1g

v West Ham1 shot
1 on target

at Everton2 shots
0 on target

v Bournemouth1 shot
1 on target

at West Ham1 shot
0 on target

at Brighton1 shot
0 on target

v Fulham1 shot
0 on target

at Burnley1 shot
0 on target

10 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 10 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.