Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Burnley

Hannibal Mejbri

Midfielder
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.051 non-penalty goals from 19 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.204 assists, 21 key passes
Finishing
+0.34goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.245% of Burnley’s build-up value

Hannibal Mejbri ranks 141st of 398 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 23.4m on average. They carry 6% of Burnley’s attacking involvement, the 7th largest share in the squad.

Against their position

142 midfielders

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.07
Non-penalty goals
0.07
xG
0.05
Non-penalty xG
0.05
Shots
1.37
npxG per shot
0.04
Shot distance
23.4m
Set-piece share
16%
Goals against xG
+0.3

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.29
Expected assists
0.20
Key passes
1.51
npxG + xA
0.26
xG chain
0.43
xG build-up
0.24
Assists against xA
+1.2

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
10season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Ranked against 142 midfielders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Next match

Shots

27 appearances
  • Over 0.515 of 2756%± 10
  • Over 1.54 of 2715%± 7
  • Over 2.50 of 270%± 0
  • Over 3.50 of 270%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 12 of 27.

Shooting profile

19 shots

Where they shoot

19 shots
Every shotBy zone
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Hannibal Mejbri, 2025/26, 19 shots in the final 35m, 1 scored.

left
49%
Centre
26%
right
25%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.039
Shots per 90
1.37
Key passes per 90
1.51
Average shot distance
23.4m
From set pieces
16%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
11%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
25%
Headed
0%

Club role

Burnley

What they are for

  • Open-play crosses5 crosses from open play became shots, worth 0.72 xG.
  • On the pitch37% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Hannibal Mejbri’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Max Weiss0.2 xG1 shot, 0g
  2. Jacob Bruun Larsen0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  3. Loum Tchaouna0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
  4. Marcus Edwards0.1 xG1 shot, 1g
  5. Zian Flemming0.0 xG2 shots, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Zian Flemming1.1 xG7 shots, 2g
  2. Jaidon Anthony0.7 xG6 shots, 1g
  3. Armando Broja0.5 xG3 shots, 0g
  4. Lyle Foster0.4 xG1 shot, 1g
  5. Loum Tchaouna0.1 xG2 shots, 0g

Season record

2025/26

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Hannibal Mejbri carries 4.7% of Burnley’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.243
    39% of midfielders
  • Possession value per 900.428
    56% of midfielders

Ranked against 142 midfielders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

27 appearances, oldest first

at Spurs1 shot
0 on target

v Sunderland1 shot
0 on target

at Man Utd1 shot
0 on target

at West Ham1 shot
1 on target

at Brentford2 shots
0 on target

v Man Utd1 shot
0 on target

v West Ham1 shot
0 on target

1g

at Palace1 shot
1 on target

at Chelsea2 shots
2 on target

v Brentford1 shot
0 on target

v Bournemouth2 shots
0 on target

at Leeds1 shot
0 on target

v Villa1 shot
0 on target

at Arsenal2 shots
0 on target

v Wolves1 shot
1 on target

12 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 12 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.