Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Leeds

Dominic Calvert-Lewin

Forward29 yrs
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.4910 non-penalty goals from 73 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.051 assists, 20 key passes
Finishing
-3.12goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.094% of Leeds’ build-up value

Dominic Calvert-Lewin ranks 35th of 398 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 11.2m on average, with 26% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 15% of Leeds’ attacking involvement, the largest share in the squad.

Against their position

109 forwards

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.46
Non-penalty goals
0.33
xG
0.62
Non-penalty xG
0.49
Shots
2.40
npxG per shot
0.20
Shot distance
11.2m
Set-piece share
26%
Goals against xG
-4.9

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.03
Expected assists
0.05
Key passes
0.66
npxG + xA
0.54
xG chain
0.59
xG build-up
0.09
Assists against xA
-0.5

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Defending

per 90
Recoveries
1.52
Defensive contribution
3.47

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
3season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Ranked against 109 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end. Recoveries and defensive contribution come from the FPL feed and are ranked in its own positions.

This week

Gameweek 7

Next fixture

Gameweek 7

vs Manchester United

Sun 18 Oct, 13:00 UTC

Manchester United concede 11.6 shots a match and are 0.80× the league norm against forwards. A difficult one.

Projected shots
2.07

2.40 per 90 × 0.86

Projected on target
1.00

1.12 per 90 × 0.89

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

35 appearances
  • Over 0.532 of 3591%± 5
  • Over 1.523 of 3566%± 8
  • Over 2.512 of 3534%± 8
  • Over 3.55 of 3514%± 6

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 3 of 35.

Shooting profile

73 shots

Where they shoot

73 shots
Every shotBy zone
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Dominic Calvert-Lewin, 2025/26, 73 shots in the final 35m, 14 scored.

left
6%
Centre
84%
right
10%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.256
Shots per 90
2.40
Key passes per 90
0.66
Average shot distance
11.2m
From set pieces
26%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
21%
Through balls
14%
Own dribble
4%
Headed
21%

Club role

Leeds

What they are for

  • PenaltiesTakes them: 5 of 8 Leeds were awarded.
  • When it mattered9 of 14 goals came with the game level or Leeds behind.
  • On the pitch80% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Dominic Calvert-Lewin’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Brenden Aaronson2.4 xG10 shots, 1g
  2. Jayden Bogle1.3 xG7 shots, 0g
  3. Anton Stach0.9 xG9 shots, 0g
  4. Gabriel Gudmundsson0.8 xG5 shots, 0g
  5. Lukas Nmecha0.7 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Brenden Aaronson0.6 xG5 shots, 1g
  2. Jayden Bogle0.3 xG2 shots, 0g
  3. Ao Tanaka0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
  4. Pascal Struijk0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
  5. Gabriel Gudmundsson0.1 xG1 shot, 0g

Season record

2025/26

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Dominic Calvert-Lewin carries 3.8% of Leeds’ build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.091
    18% of forwards
  • Possession value per 900.594
    68% of forwards

Ranked against 109 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

35 appearances, oldest first

v Newcastle2 shots
1 on target

at Fulham1 shot
1 on target

1g

at Wolves1 shot
1 on target

v Bournemouth3 shots
3 on target

v Spurs2 shots
1 on target

at Burnley4 shots
0 on target

v West Ham1 shot
0 on target

at Brighton1 shot
0 on target

at Forest2 shots
1 on target

v Villa2 shots
0 on target

1g

at Man City1 shot
1 on target

1g

v Chelsea3 shots
1 on target

1g

v Liverpool4 shots
1 on target

1g

at Brentford3 shots
2 on target

2g

v Palace3 shots
3 on target

1g

at Sunderland1 shot
1 on target

v Man Utd2 shots
0 on target

1g

at Newcastle3 shots
1 on target

v Fulham2 shots
1 on target

at Everton2 shots
1 on target

1g

v Forest2 shots
1 on target

at Villa3 shots
2 on target

v Man City4 shots
0 on target

v Sunderland1 shot
0 on target

at Palace3 shots
2 on target

v Brentford1 shot
1 on target

at Man Utd5 shots
2 on target

1g

v Wolves4 shots
2 on target

1g

v Burnley2 shots
1 on target

1g

at Spurs2 shots
1 on target

1g

v Brighton1 shot
1 on target

at West Ham2 shots
1 on target

3 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 3 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.