Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Dominic Calvert-Lewin

Forward29 yrsPenalties 1st
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.582 non-penalty goals from 11 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.031 assists, 2 key passes
Finishing
-0.99goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.086% of Leeds’ build-up value

Dominic Calvert-Lewin ranks 13th of 138 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 11.6m on average. They carry 22% of Leeds’ attacking involvement, the largest share in the squad.

Against their position

23 forwards

Average match rating6.70

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.35
Non-penalty goals
0.35
xG
0.58
Non-penalty xG
0.58
Shots
1.93
Shots on target
1.00
Shot accuracy
–not ranked
npxG per shot
0.30
Shot distance
11.6m
Set-piece share
8%
Goals against xG
-1.3

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.18
Expected assists
0.03
Key passes
0.35
npxG + xA
0.61
xG chain
0.63
xG build-up
0.08
Assists against xA
+0.8

On the ball

per 90
Touches
23.33
Passes
13.33
Pass completion
–not ranked
Take-ons attempted
0.67
Take-on success
–not ranked
Dispossessed
0.00

Defending

per 90
Tackles
0.67
Tackles won
–not ranked
Interceptions
0.00
Clearances
1.33
Aerials won
5.33
Aerial success
53%
Dribbled past
0.67

Discipline

per 90
Fouls committed
2.33
Caught offside
1.33
Errors
0season count
Yellow cards
3season count
Red cards
0season count

Ranked against 23 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Gameweek 7

Next fixture

Gameweek 7

vs Manchester United

Sun 18 Oct, 13:00 UTC

Manchester United concede 11.0 shots a match and are 0.97× the league norm against central attack (24 shots so far). A difficult one.

Projected shots
1.69

1.93 per 90 × 0.88

Projected on target
0.88

0.88 per 90 × 1.00

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

6 appearances
  • Over 0.55 of 683%± 15
  • Over 1.53 of 650%± 20
  • Over 2.52 of 633%± 19
  • Over 3.51 of 617%± 15

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 1 of 6.

Shooting profile

11 shots

Where they shoot

11 shots
18% of shots, 2 shots9% of shots, 1 shot27% of shots, 3 shots18% of shots, 2 shots9% of shots, 1 shot9% of shots, 1 shot9% of shots, 1 shot18%9%27%18%9%9%9%Opponent goalLeftRight
Share of shots<1%1–2%2–4%4–6%6%+

Dominic Calvert-Lewin, 2026/27, final 35m.

left
16%
Centre
81%
right
3%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.304
Shots per 90
1.93
Key passes per 90
0.35
Average shot distance
11.6m
From set pieces
8%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
17%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
16%
Headed
3%

Club role

Leeds

What they are for

  • On the pitch95% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Dominic Calvert-Lewin’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Lukas Nmecha0.8 xG1 shot, 1g
  2. Tarik Muharemovic0.5 xG1 shot, 1g
  3. James Justin0.5 xG2 shots, 0g
  4. Nico Elvedi0.3 xG1 shot, 0g
  5. Joe Rodon0.1 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. James Justin0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  2. Jayden Bogle0.1 xG1 shot, 1g

Season record

2026/27

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Dominic Calvert-Lewin carries 5.8% of Leeds’ build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.081
    6% of forwards
  • Possession value per 900.630
    38% of forwards

Ranked against 16 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

6 appearances, oldest first

at Forest3 shots
0 on target

1g

v Brentford1 shot
1 on target

at Brighton2 shots
1 on target

1g

v Newcastle4 shots
2 on target

v Palace1 shot
1 on target

1 blankno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so one sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.