Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

West Ham

Crysencio Summerville

Forward
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.205 non-penalty goals from 54 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.122 assists, 28 key passes
Finishing
-0.03goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.147% of West Ham’s build-up value

Crysencio Summerville ranks 116th of 398 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 17.6m on average. They carry 11% of West Ham’s attacking involvement, the 2nd largest share in the squad.

Against their position

109 forwards

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.18
Non-penalty goals
0.18
xG
0.20
Non-penalty xG
0.20
Shots
1.94
npxG per shot
0.11
Shot distance
17.6m
Set-piece share
6%
Goals against xG
-0.7

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.07
Expected assists
0.12
Key passes
1.00
npxG + xA
0.32
xG chain
0.40
xG build-up
0.14
Assists against xA
-1.2

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
6season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Ranked against 109 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Next match

Shots

31 appearances
  • Over 0.526 of 3184%± 7
  • Over 1.517 of 3155%± 9
  • Over 2.58 of 3126%± 8
  • Over 3.52 of 316%± 4

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 5 of 31.

Shooting profile

54 shots

Where they shoot

54 shots
Every shotBy zone
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Crysencio Summerville, 2025/26, 53 shots in the final 35m, 5 scored.

left
56%
Centre
17%
right
27%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.106
Shots per 90
1.94
Key passes per 90
1.00
Average shot distance
17.6m
From set pieces
6%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
5%
Through balls
21%
Own dribble
7%
Headed
8%

Club role

West Ham

What they are for

  • Corners and set piecesSupplies 5% of West Ham’s dead-ball danger, from 6 deliveries that became shots.
  • When it mattered4 of 5 goals came with the game level or West Ham behind.
  • On the pitch73% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Crysencio Summerville’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Mateus Fernandes1.3 xG8 shots, 2g
  2. Jarrod Bowen1.2 xG8 shots, 2g
  3. Lucas Paquetá0.6 xG2 shots, 0g
  4. Valentín Castellanos0.4 xG6 shots, 0g
  5. El Hadji Malick Diouf0.4 xG6 shots, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Valentín Castellanos1.0 xG7 shots, 0g
  2. Callum Wilson0.8 xG3 shots, 1g
  3. Jarrod Bowen0.6 xG10 shots, 1g
  4. Tomas Soucek0.4 xG1 shot, 0g
  5. Konstantinos Mavropanos0.1 xG1 shot, 0g

Season record

2025/26

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Crysencio Summerville carries 7.4% of West Ham’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.142
    46% of forwards
  • Possession value per 900.398
    27% of forwards

Ranked against 109 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

31 appearances, oldest first

at Everton3 shots
1 on target

at Arsenal1 shot
0 on target

v Brentford2 shots
0 on target

v Newcastle3 shots
1 on target

v Burnley3 shots
0 on target

at Brighton2 shots
1 on target

v Villa3 shots
0 on target

at Man City1 shot
1 on target

v Fulham2 shots
0 on target

v Brighton1 shot
1 on target

v Forest1 shot
1 on target

1g

at Spurs5 shots
1 on target

1g

v Sunderland2 shots
1 on target

1g

at Chelsea2 shots
1 on target

1g

at Burnley2 shots
2 on target

v Man Utd1 shot
1 on target

v Bournemouth4 shots
1 on target

at Liverpool3 shots
1 on target

1g

at Fulham2 shots
1 on target

v Wolves3 shots
0 on target

at Palace1 shot
0 on target

v Everton2 shots
0 on target

at Brentford2 shots
0 on target

v Arsenal1 shot
0 on target

at Newcastle1 shot
0 on target

v Leeds1 shot
0 on target

5 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 5 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.