Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

West Ham

Crysencio Summerville

Forward
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.211 non-penalty goals from 14 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.261 assists, 17 key passes
Finishing
-0.64goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.142% of West Ham’s build-up value

Crysencio Summerville ranks 74th of 397 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 14.8m on average. They carry 4% of West Ham’s attacking involvement, the 11th largest share in the squad.

Against their position

104 forwards

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.12
Non-penalty goals
0.12
xG
0.21
Non-penalty xG
0.21
Shots
1.66
npxG per shot
0.13
Shot distance
14.8m
Set-piece share
4%
Goals against xG
-0.8

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.12
Expected assists
0.26
Key passes
2.01
npxG + xA
0.47
xG chain
0.52
xG build-up
0.14
Assists against xA
-1.2

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
2season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Ranked against 104 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Next match

Shots

19 appearances
  • Over 0.510 of 1953%± 11
  • Over 1.53 of 1916%± 8
  • Over 2.51 of 195%± 5
  • Over 3.50 of 190%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 9 of 19.

Shooting profile

14 shots

Where they shoot

14 shots
Every shotBy zone
7% of shots, 1 shot7% of shots, 1 shot14% of shots, 2 shots7% of shots, 1 shot36% of shots, 5 shots7% of shots, 1 shot7% of shots, 1 shot14% of shots, 2 shots7%7%14%7%36%7%7%14%Opponent goalLeftRight
Share of shots<1%1–2%2–4%4–6%6%+

Crysencio Summerville, 2024/25, final 35m.

left
67%
Centre
33%
right
0%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.130
Shots per 90
1.66
Key passes per 90
2.01
Average shot distance
14.8m
From set pieces
4%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
3%
Through balls
7%
Own dribble
3%
Headed
4%

Club role

West Ham

What they are for

  • Corners and set piecesSupplies 8% of West Ham’s dead-ball danger, from 4 deliveries that became shots.
  • On the pitch22% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Crysencio Summerville’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Danny Ings0.6 xG1 shot, 1g
  2. Jarrod Bowen0.6 xG3 shots, 0g
  3. Lucas Paquetá0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Niclas Füllkrug0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  5. Aaron Wan-Bissaka0.1 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Niclas Füllkrug0.6 xG1 shot, 1g
  2. Mohammed Kudus0.5 xG3 shots, 0g
  3. Danny Ings0.4 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Jarrod Bowen0.2 xG3 shots, 0g
  5. Lucas Paquetá0.1 xG2 shots, 0g

Season record

2024/25

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Crysencio Summerville carries 1.6% of West Ham’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.140
    23% of forwards
  • Possession value per 900.515
    33% of forwards

Ranked against 104 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

19 appearances, oldest first

v Man City1 shot
1 on target

at Brentford1 shot
0 on target

1g

v Man Utd1 shot
1 on target

v Everton1 shot
1 on target

at Leicester2 shots
0 on target

v Wolves3 shots
0 on target

v Brighton1 shot
0 on target

at Southampton1 shot
0 on target

v Liverpool1 shot
0 on target

at Man City2 shots
1 on target

9 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 9 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.