Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Conor Chaplin

Forward
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.151 non-penalty goals from 16 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.081 assists, 8 key passes
Finishing
-0.29goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.152% of Ipswich’s build-up value

Conor Chaplin ranks 166th of 397 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 16.8m on average, with 26% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 3% of Ipswich’s attacking involvement, the 14th largest share in the squad.

Against their position

104 forwards

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.11
Non-penalty goals
0.11
xG
0.15
Non-penalty xG
0.15
Shots
1.69
npxG per shot
0.09
Shot distance
16.8m
Set-piece share
26%
Goals against xG
-0.4

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.11
Expected assists
0.08
Key passes
0.85
npxG + xA
0.24
xG chain
0.34
xG build-up
0.15
Assists against xA
+0.2

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
2season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Ranked against 104 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Gameweek 8

Next fixture

Gameweek 8

vs Nottingham Forest

Fri 23 Oct, 19:00 UTC

Nottingham Forest concede 14.0 shots a match and are 1.07× the league norm against forwards. Roughly an average matchup.

Projected shots
1.82

1.69 per 90 × 1.07

Projected on target
0.31

0.32 per 90 × 0.98

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

22 appearances
  • Over 0.57 of 2232%± 10
  • Over 1.55 of 2223%± 9
  • Over 2.52 of 229%± 6
  • Over 3.51 of 225%± 4

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 15 of 22.

Shooting profile

16 shots

Where they shoot

16 shots
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Conor Chaplin, 2024/25, 16 shots in the final 35m, 1 scored.

left
0%
Centre
84%
right
16%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.090
Shots per 90
1.69
Key passes per 90
0.85
Average shot distance
16.8m
From set pieces
26%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
0%
Through balls
8%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
0%

Club role

Ipswich

What they are for

  • On the pitch25% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Conor Chaplin’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Jack Clarke0.5 xG1 shot, 0g
  2. Leif Davis0.3 xG3 shots, 0g
  3. Sam Morsy0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
  4. Cameron Burgess0.1 xG1 shot, 1g
  5. Jack Taylor0.1 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. George Hirst0.3 xG1 shot, 1g
  2. Ali Al-Hamadi0.2 xG1 shot, 0g
  3. Sammie Szmodics0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Jens Cajuste0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
  5. Cameron Burgess0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Season record

2024/25

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Conor Chaplin carries 2.0% of Ipswich’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.149
    26% of forwards
  • Possession value per 900.336
    6% of forwards

Ranked against 104 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

22 appearances, oldest first

v Everton1 shot
1 on target

v Leicester3 shots
0 on target

v Man Utd1 shot
1 on target

1g

v Bournemouth5 shots
1 on target

at Wolves2 shots
0 on target

at Leicester2 shots
0 on target

v West Ham2 shots
0 on target

15 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 15 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.