Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Chelsea

Armando Broja

Forward
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.451 non-penalty goals from 13 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.131 assists, 4 key passes
Finishing
-1.37goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.301% of Chelsea’s build-up value

Armando Broja ranks 44th of 402 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 11.7m on average. They carry 2% of Chelsea’s attacking involvement, the 10th largest share in the squad.

Against their position

107 forwards

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.18
Non-penalty goals
0.18
xG
0.45
Non-penalty xG
0.45
Shots
2.34
npxG per shot
0.19
Shot distance
11.7m
Set-piece share
0%
Goals against xG
-1.5

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.18
Expected assists
0.13
Key passes
0.72
npxG + xA
0.58
xG chain
0.76
xG build-up
0.30
Assists against xA
+0.3

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
0season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Ranked against 107 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Gameweek 8

Next fixture

Gameweek 8

vs Tottenham

Sat 24 Oct, 16:30 UTC

Tottenham concede 12.9 shots a match and are 0.95× the league norm against forwards. Roughly an average matchup.

Projected shots
2.21

2.34 per 90 × 0.94

Projected on target
0.33

0.36 per 90 × 0.92

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

21 appearances
  • Over 0.510 of 2148%± 11
  • Over 1.53 of 2114%± 8
  • Over 2.50 of 210%± 0
  • Over 3.50 of 210%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 11 of 21.

Shooting profile

13 shots

Where they shoot

13 shots
Every shotBy zone
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Armando Broja, 2023/24, 13 shots in the final 35m, 1 scored.

left
22%
Centre
69%
right
10%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.191
Shots per 90
2.34
Key passes per 90
0.72
Average shot distance
11.7m
From set pieces
0%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
32%
Through balls
3%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
25%

Club role

Chelsea

What they are for

  • On the pitch15% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Armando Broja’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Cole Palmer1.2 xG2 shots, 0g
  2. Malo Gusto0.2 xG2 shots, 0g
  3. Reece James0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Mykhailo Mudryk0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  5. Thiago Silva0.1 xG2 shots, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Alex Iwobi0.6 xG1 shot, 1g
  2. Conor Gallagher0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
  3. Cole Palmer0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Season record

2023/24

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Armando Broja carries 0.9% of Chelsea’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.297
    71% of forwards
  • Possession value per 900.762
    69% of forwards

Ranked against 107 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

21 appearances, oldest first

v Villa1 shot
0 on target

1g

at Fulham2 shots
1 on target

at Burnley1 shot
0 on target

at Man Utd1 shot
0 on target

at Everton1 shot
0 on target

v Sheffield Utd2 shots
0 on target

at Wolves1 shot
0 on target

v Palace1 shot
0 on target

at Luton1 shot
1 on target

v Fulham2 shots
0 on target

11 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 11 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.