+0.68goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.477% of Aston Villa’s build-up value
league 0.27
Amadou Onana ranks 197th of 397 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 14.8m on average, with 88% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 5% of Aston Villa’s attacking involvement, the 7th largest share in the squad.
Injured. Knee injury - Unknown return date. The rates below describe what he did, not what he is about to do. Club status as of 17 Oct 2026.
Against their position
137 midfielders
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.1677th
Non-penalty goals
0.1678th
xG
0.1470th
Non-penalty xG
0.1470th
Shots
0.9343rd
npxG per shot
0.1594th
Shot distance
14.8m92nd
Set-piece share
88%99th
Goals against xG
+0.482nd
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.0012th
Expected assists
0.0416th
Key passes
0.5516th
npxG + xA
0.1844th
xG chain
0.4965th
xG build-up
0.4787th
Assists against xA
-0.732nd
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Defending
per 90
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
4season count
Red cards
0season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Ranked against 137 midfielders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.
This week
Gameweek 8
Next fixture
Gameweek 8
vsManchester City
Sat 24 Oct, 11:30 UTC
Manchester City concede 9.3 shots a match and are 0.68× the league norm against midfielders. A difficult one.
Projected shots
0.65
0.93 per 90 × 0.70
Projected on target
0.25
0.33 per 90 × 0.76
Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.
Shots
26 appearances
Over 0.511 of 2642%± 10
Over 1.55 of 2619%± 8
Over 2.51 of 264%± 4
Over 3.50 of 260%± 0
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 15 of 26.
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals
Amadou Onana, 2024/25, 17 shots in the final 35m, 3 scored.
left
5%
Centre
68%
right
27%
share of their shooting xG
Chance profile
quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.152
Shots per 90
0.93
Key passes per 90
0.55
Average shot distance
14.8m
From set pieces
88%
How the chances arrive
Crosses
0%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
0%
Club role
Aston Villa
What they are for
When it mattered2 of 3 goals came with the game level or Aston Villa behind.
On the pitch48% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Amadou Onana’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Youri Tielemans1.1 xG8 shots, 1g
Ollie Watkins0.6 xG1 shot, 1g
Lucas Digne0.5 xG3 shots, 0g
Morgan Rogers0.1 xG2 shots, 1g
Marcus Rashford0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Morgan Rogers0.4 xG1 shot, 0g
John McGinn0.1 xG3 shots, 0g
Jacob Ramsey0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Leon Bailey0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Marcus Rashford0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
Season record
2024/25
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Amadou Onana carries 6.7%of Aston Villa’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.466
87% of midfielders
Possession value per 900.492
64% of midfielders
Ranked against 137 midfielders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
26 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
1g
at West Ham1 shot 1 on target
v Arsenal2 shots 0 on target
1g
at Leicester3 shots 1 on target
v Bournemouth2 shots 1 on target
at Spurs2 shots 0 on target
at Liverpool1 shot 1 on target
v Man City1 shot 0 on target
at Everton2 shots 0 on target
at Southampton1 shot 1 on target
1g
v Newcastle1 shot 1 on target
at Man City1 shot 0 on target
15 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 15 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.