Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Crystal Palace

Yeremi Pino

Midfielder23 yrs
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.182 non-penalty goals from 45 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.362 assists, 48 key passes
Finishing
-1.86goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.195% of Crystal Palace’s build-up value

Yeremi Pino ranks 34th of 398 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 19.4m on average. They carry 12% of Crystal Palace’s attacking involvement, the 2nd largest share in the squad.

Against their position

109 forwards

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.08
Non-penalty goals
0.08
xG
0.18
Non-penalty xG
0.18
Shots
1.90
npxG per shot
0.10
Shot distance
19.4m
Set-piece share
13%
Goals against xG
-2.4

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.08
Expected assists
0.36
Key passes
2.02
npxG + xA
0.54
xG chain
0.57
xG build-up
0.19
Assists against xA
-6.5

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Defending

per 90
Recoveries
4.38
Defensive contribution
7.25

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
4season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Ranked against 109 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end. Recoveries and defensive contribution come from the FPL feed and are ranked in its own positions.

This week

Gameweek 7

Next fixture

Gameweek 7

away to Brighton

Sun 18 Oct, 13:00 UTC

Brighton concede 11.7 shots a match and are 1.06× the league norm against forwards. Roughly an average matchup.

Projected shots
1.89

1.90 per 90 × 1.00

Projected on target
0.43

0.46 per 90 × 0.92

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

34 appearances
  • Over 0.524 of 3471%± 8
  • Over 1.514 of 3441%± 8
  • Over 2.56 of 3418%± 7
  • Over 3.51 of 343%± 3

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 10 of 34.

Shooting profile

45 shots

Where they shoot

45 shots
Every shotBy zone
2% of shots, 1 shot7% of shots, 3 shots13% of shots, 6 shots2% of shots, 1 shot4% of shots, 2 shots9% of shots, 4 shots4% of shots, 2 shots7% of shots, 3 shots9% of shots, 4 shots9% of shots, 4 shots4% of shots, 2 shots7% of shots, 3 shots2% of shots, 1 shot2% of shots, 1 shot2% of shots, 1 shot7% of shots, 3 shots2% of shots, 1 shot4% of shots, 2 shots7%13%9%7%9%9%7%7%Opponent goalLeftRight
Share of shots<1%1–2%2–4%4–6%6%+

Yeremi Pino, 2025/26, final 35m. A further 2% of their shots came from outside this window.

left
57%
Centre
42%
right
2%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.097
Shots per 90
1.90
Key passes per 90
2.02
Average shot distance
19.4m
From set pieces
13%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
3%
Through balls
16%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
2%

Club role

Crystal Palace

What they are for

  • Corners and set piecesSupplies 19% of Crystal Palace’s dead-ball danger, from 14 deliveries that became shots.
  • On the pitch62% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Yeremi Pino’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Ismaila Sarr0.7 xG3 shots, 0g
  2. Adam Wharton0.5 xG4 shots, 1g
  3. Daichi Kamada0.3 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Will Hughes0.3 xG5 shots, 0g
  5. Tyrick Mitchell0.3 xG5 shots, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Jean-Philippe Mateta2.5 xG9 shots, 1g
  2. Ismaila Sarr1.8 xG8 shots, 0g
  3. Jefferson Lerma1.1 xG3 shots, 0g
  4. Will Hughes0.8 xG5 shots, 0g
  5. Marc Guehi0.6 xG2 shots, 1g

Season record

2025/26

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Yeremi Pino carries 5.1% of Crystal Palace’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.193
    63% of forwards
  • Possession value per 900.568
    60% of forwards

Ranked against 109 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

34 appearances, oldest first

at Villa1 shot
0 on target

v Sunderland3 shots
0 on target

at West Ham2 shots
0 on target

v Liverpool1 shot
1 on target

at Everton1 shot
1 on target

v Bournemouth1 shot
0 on target

v Brentford1 shot
0 on target

v Brighton2 shots
1 on target

1g

at Wolves2 shots
1 on target

v Man Utd1 shot
0 on target

at Fulham2 shots
0 on target

v Man City4 shots
2 on target

at Leeds2 shots
0 on target

v Spurs2 shots
0 on target

v Fulham3 shots
0 on target

v Villa3 shots
2 on target

1g

at Sunderland2 shots
1 on target

v Chelsea1 shot
0 on target

v Wolves3 shots
1 on target

v Leeds1 shot
0 on target

v Newcastle2 shots
1 on target

at Liverpool1 shot
0 on target

at Man City1 shot
0 on target

v Arsenal3 shots
0 on target

10 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 10 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.