Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Victor Lindelöf

Defender32 yrs
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.031 non-penalty goals from 6 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.021 assists, 8 key passes
Finishing
+0.59goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.254% of Manchester United’s build-up value

Victor Lindelöf ranks 348th of 402 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 10.2m on average, with 76% of their danger coming from set pieces.

Against their position

135 defenders

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.07
Non-penalty goals
0.07
xG
0.03
Non-penalty xG
0.03
Shots
0.40
npxG per shot
–not ranked
Shot distance
–not ranked
Set-piece share
–not ranked
Goals against xG
+0.6

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.07
Expected assists
0.02
Key passes
0.54
npxG + xA
0.05
xG chain
0.26
xG build-up
0.25
Assists against xA
+0.7

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
2season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Ranked against 135 defenders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Gameweek 8

Next fixture

Gameweek 8

vs Manchester City

Sat 24 Oct, 11:30 UTC

Manchester City concede 7.8 shots a match and are 0.74× the league norm against defenders. A difficult one.

Projected shots
0.26

0.40 per 90 × 0.65

Projected on target
0.16

0.27 per 90 × 0.60

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

19 appearances
  • Over 0.55 of 1926%± 10
  • Over 1.51 of 195%± 5
  • Over 2.50 of 190%± 0
  • Over 3.50 of 190%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 14 of 19.

Shooting profile

6 shots

Where they shoot

6 shots
17% of shots, 1 shot33% of shots, 2 shots17% of shots, 1 shot17% of shots, 1 shot17% of shots, 1 shot17%33%17%17%17%Opponent goalLeftRight
Share of shots<1%1–2%2–4%4–6%6%+

Victor Lindelöf, 2023/24, final 35m.

left
10%
Centre
82%
right
7%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.072
Shots per 90
0.40
Key passes per 90
0.54
Average shot distance
10.2m
From set pieces
76%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
0%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
56%

Club role

Manchester United

What they are for

  • On the pitch39% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Victor Lindelöf’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Jonny Evans0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  2. Bruno Fernandes0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  3. Christian Eriksen0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Casemiro0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
  5. Luke Shaw0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Marcus Rashford0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
  2. Alejandro Garnacho0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
  3. Antony0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
  4. Diogo Dalot0.0 xG1 shot, 1g
  5. Bruno Fernandes0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Season record

2023/24

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Victor Lindelöf carries 3.7% of Manchester United’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.245
    50% of defenders
  • Possession value per 900.259
    34% of defenders

Ranked against 135 defenders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

19 appearances, oldest first

v Brighton1 shot
0 on target

1g

v Luton1 shot
1 on target

v Chelsea1 shot
0 on target

v Fulham1 shot
1 on target

v Everton2 shots
2 on target

14 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 14 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.