Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Valentino Livramento

Defender23 yrs
Injured
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.071 non-penalty goals from 4 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.080 assists, 12 key passes
Finishing
+0.08goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.374% of Newcastle United’s build-up value

Valentino Livramento ranks 233rd of 402 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 14.3m on average.

Injured. Unspecified injury - Expected back 2 Nov. The rates below describe what he did, not what he is about to do. Club status as of 18 Oct 2026.

Against their position

135 defenders

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.07
Non-penalty goals
0.07
xG
0.07
Non-penalty xG
0.07
Shots
0.28
npxG per shot
–not ranked
Shot distance
–not ranked
Set-piece share
–not ranked
Goals against xG
+0.0

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.00
Expected assists
0.08
Key passes
0.85
npxG + xA
0.14
xG chain
0.47
xG build-up
0.37
Assists against xA
-1.1

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
1season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Ranked against 135 defenders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Gameweek 8

Next fixture

Gameweek 8

away to Crystal Palace

Sun 25 Oct, 14:00 UTC

Crystal Palace concede 12.1 shots a match and are 1.19× the league norm against defenders. Roughly an average matchup.

Projected shots
0.29

0.28 per 90 × 1.03

Projected on target
0.12

0.14 per 90 × 0.83

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

26 appearances
  • Over 0.54 of 2615%± 7
  • Over 1.50 of 260%± 0
  • Over 2.50 of 260%± 0
  • Over 3.50 of 260%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 22 of 26.

Shooting profile

4 shots

Where they shoot

4 shots
25% of shots, 1 shot25% of shots, 1 shot25% of shots, 1 shot25% of shots, 1 shot25%25%25%25%Opponent goalLeftRight
Share of shots<1%1–2%2–4%4–6%6%+

Valentino Livramento, 2023/24, final 35m.

left
7%
Centre
58%
right
35%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.240
Shots per 90
0.28
Key passes per 90
0.85
Average shot distance
14.3m
From set pieces
0%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
0%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
58%
Headed
0%

Club role

Newcastle United

What they are for

  • On the pitch37% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Valentino Livramento’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Fabian Schär0.6 xG1 shot, 1g
  2. Callum Wilson0.3 xG1 shot, 0g
  3. Joe Willock0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Sean Longstaff0.7 xG3 shots, 0g
  2. Harvey Barnes0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  3. Anthony Gordon0.1 xG4 shots, 0g
  4. Miguel Almirón0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  5. Jacob Murphy0.0 xG2 shots, 0g

Season record

2023/24

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Valentino Livramento carries 3.6% of Newcastle United’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.372
    70% of defenders
  • Possession value per 900.469
    75% of defenders

Ranked against 135 defenders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

26 appearances, oldest first

v Fulham1 shot
0 on target

1g

v Wolves1 shot
1 on target

at Chelsea1 shot
0 on target

at Burnley1 shot
1 on target

22 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 22 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.