+0.04goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.477% of Fulham’s build-up value
league 0.28
Tom Cairney ranks 154th of 402 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 24.2m on average, with 23% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 7% of Fulham’s attacking involvement, the 8th largest share in the squad.
Against their position
128 midfielders
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.0646th
Non-penalty goals
0.0646th
xG
0.0639th
Non-penalty xG
0.0639th
Shots
1.0745th
npxG per shot
0.0627th
Shot distance
24.2m11th
Set-piece share
23%57th
Goals against xG
-0.068th
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.2591st
Expected assists
0.2082nd
Key passes
1.5879th
npxG + xA
0.2666th
xG chain
0.5768th
xG build-up
0.4776th
Assists against xA
+0.988th
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Defending
per 90
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
3season count
Red cards
0season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.
Ranked against 128 midfielders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.
This week
Gameweek 8
Next fixture
Gameweek 8
away toCoventry
Sat 24 Oct, 14:00 UTC
No shot record for Coventry in this season, so no opponent adjustment is possible. Newly promoted sides have no Premier League history to measure.
Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.
Shots
34 appearances
Over 0.515 of 3444%± 9
Over 1.52 of 346%± 4
Over 2.51 of 343%± 3
Over 3.50 of 340%± 0
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 19 of 34.
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals
Tom Cairney, 2023/24, 17 shots in the final 35m, 1 scored.
left
18%
Centre
73%
right
8%
share of their shooting xG
Chance profile
quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.059
Shots per 90
1.07
Key passes per 90
1.58
Average shot distance
24.2m
From set pieces
23%
How the chances arrive
Crosses
2%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
2%
Club role
Fulham
What they are for
On the pitch42% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Tom Cairney’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Andreas Pereira0.4 xG1 shot, 1g
Willian0.2 xG4 shots, 0g
Raúl Jiménez0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
João Palhinha0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
Rodrigo Muniz0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Bobby Reid0.7 xG5 shots, 2g
Sasa Lukic0.6 xG2 shots, 0g
Willian0.5 xG5 shots, 0g
Raúl Jiménez0.4 xG2 shots, 1g
João Palhinha0.4 xG2 shots, 0g
Season record
2023/24
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Tom Cairney carries 7.0%of Fulham’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.465
76% of midfielders
Possession value per 900.573
67% of midfielders
Ranked against 128 midfielders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
34 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
at Everton1 shot 0 on target
v Sheffield Utd1 shot 0 on target
at Spurs1 shot 1 on target
v Wolves3 shots 1 on target
1g
v Forest1 shot 1 on target
at Newcastle1 shot 1 on target
v Arsenal1 shot 1 on target
at Chelsea2 shots 0 on target
v Everton1 shot 0 on target
at Wolves1 shot 0 on target
at Sheffield Utd1 shot 1 on target
at Forest1 shot 0 on target
v Newcastle1 shot 0 on target
v Liverpool1 shot 1 on target
at Luton1 shot 1 on target
19 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 19 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.
