-0.45goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.174% of Everton’s build-up value
league 0.24
Tim Iroegbunam ranks 240th of 398 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 20.9m on average, with 30% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 3% of Everton’s attacking involvement, the 10th largest share in the squad.
Against their position
142 midfielders
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.0013th
Non-penalty goals
0.0013th
xG
0.0311th
Non-penalty xG
0.0312th
Shots
0.7224th
npxG per shot
0.048th
Shot distance
20.9m34th
Set-piece share
30%66th
Goals against xG
-0.538th
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.1264th
Expected assists
0.1150th
Key passes
0.4815th
npxG + xA
0.1430th
xG chain
0.2719th
xG build-up
0.1718th
Assists against xA
+0.268th
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Defending
per 90
Recoveries
4.7562nd
Defensive contribution
11.5289th
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
9season count
Red cards
0season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Ranked against 142 midfielders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end. Recoveries and defensive contribution come from the FPL feed and are ranked in its own positions.
This week
Gameweek 8
Next fixture
Gameweek 8
vsBrentford
Sun 25 Oct, 14:00 UTC
Brentford concede 13.2 shots a match and are 1.07× the league norm against midfielders. Roughly an average matchup.
Projected shots
0.77
0.72 per 90 × 1.06
Projected on target
0.06
0.06 per 90 × 1.01
Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.
Shots
29 appearances
Over 0.510 of 2934%± 9
Over 1.52 of 297%± 5
Over 2.50 of 290%± 0
Over 3.50 of 290%± 0
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 19 of 29.
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals
Tim Iroegbunam, 2025/26, 12 shots in the final 35m, 0 scored.
left
39%
Centre
45%
right
16%
share of their shooting xG
Chance profile
quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.043
Shots per 90
0.72
Key passes per 90
0.48
Average shot distance
20.9m
From set pieces
30%
How the chances arrive
Crosses
0%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
27%
Headed
0%
Club role
Everton
What they are for
Corners and set piecesSupplies 5% of Everton’s dead-ball danger, from 2 deliveries that became shots.
On the pitch44% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Tim Iroegbunam’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
James Garner0.2 xG3 shots, 0g
James Tarkowski0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Vitalii Mykolenko0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Beto0.6 xG1 shot, 0g
Michael Keane0.6 xG1 shot, 1g
Idrissa Gueye0.5 xG1 shot, 1g
Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Jack Grealish0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
Season record
2025/26
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Tim Iroegbunam carries 3.9%of Everton’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.171
18% of midfielders
Possession value per 900.266
19% of midfielders
Ranked against 142 midfielders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
29 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
v Brighton1 shot 0 on target
at Wolves1 shot 0 on target
v Villa1 shot 0 on target
at Bournemouth1 shot 0 on target
v Brentford1 shot 0 on target
v Wolves2 shots 0 on target
v Man Utd1 shot 0 on target
v Chelsea1 shot 1 on target
at West Ham2 shots 0 on target
at Palace1 shot 0 on target
19 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 19 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.
