Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Thiago Silva

Defender
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.033 non-penalty goals from 14 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.051 assists, 9 key passes
Finishing
+2.25goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.508% of Chelsea’s build-up value

Thiago Silva ranks 318th of 402 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 10.6m on average, with 100% of their danger coming from set pieces.

Against their position

135 defenders

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.11
Non-penalty goals
0.11
xG
0.03
Non-penalty xG
0.03
Shots
0.50
npxG per shot
0.06
Shot distance
10.6m
Set-piece share
100%
Goals against xG
+2.2

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.04
Expected assists
0.05
Key passes
0.32
npxG + xA
0.08
xG chain
0.51
xG build-up
0.50
Assists against xA
-0.4

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
4season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Ranked against 135 defenders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Gameweek 8

Next fixture

Gameweek 8

vs Tottenham

Sat 24 Oct, 16:30 UTC

Tottenham concede 12.9 shots a match and are 1.08× the league norm against defenders. Roughly an average matchup.

Projected shots
0.50

0.50 per 90 × 1.01

Projected on target
0.13

0.14 per 90 × 0.92

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

31 appearances
  • Over 0.511 of 3135%± 9
  • Over 1.53 of 3110%± 5
  • Over 2.50 of 310%± 0
  • Over 3.50 of 310%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 20 of 31.

Shooting profile

14 shots

Where they shoot

14 shots
7% of shots, 1 shot21% of shots, 3 shots21% of shots, 3 shots21% of shots, 3 shots14% of shots, 2 shots7% of shots, 1 shot7% of shots, 1 shot7%21%21%21%14%7%7%Opponent goalLeftRight
Share of shots<1%1–2%2–4%4–6%6%+

Thiago Silva, 2023/24, final 35m.

left
25%
Centre
43%
right
32%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.057
Shots per 90
0.50
Key passes per 90
0.32
Average shot distance
10.6m
From set pieces
100%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
0%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
0%

Club role

Chelsea

What they are for

  • Corners and set piecesSupplies 6% of Chelsea’s dead-ball danger, from 2 deliveries that became shots.
  • When it mattered3 of 3 goals came with the game level or Chelsea behind.
  • On the pitch74% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Thiago Silva’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Conor Gallagher0.5 xG6 shots, 2g
  2. Cole Palmer0.1 xG3 shots, 0g
  3. Ben Chilwell0.0 xG2 shots, 0g
  4. Mykhailo Mudryk0.0 xG1 shot, 1g
  5. Enzo Fernández0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Raheem Sterling0.6 xG2 shots, 0g
  2. Noni Madueke0.6 xG1 shot, 1g
  3. Armando Broja0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
  4. Levi Colwill0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
  5. Nicolas Jackson0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Season record

2023/24

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Thiago Silva carries 7.7% of Chelsea’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.505
    85% of defenders
  • Possession value per 900.509
    79% of defenders

Ranked against 135 defenders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

31 appearances, oldest first

at West Ham1 shot
0 on target

v Forest1 shot
1 on target

v Brentford2 shots
0 on target

at Spurs1 shot
0 on target

1g

v Man City1 shot
1 on target

1g

v Wolves2 shots
1 on target

at Palace1 shot
0 on target

1g

at Sheffield Utd1 shot
1 on target

at Villa1 shot
0 on target

v West Ham1 shot
0 on target

at Forest2 shots
0 on target

20 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 20 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.